Article Image
News Link • NATO

NATO in Syria: Is Direct Miitary Intervention Next?

• by Stephen Lendman

On March 6, the BBC reported Obama saying Washington won't intervene in Syria unilaterally. At the same time, he stopped short of ruling out joint Western aggression. In his first 2012 news conference, he said:


"The notion that the way to solve every one of these problems is to deploy our military, that hasn't been true in the past, and it won't be true now."


"We've got to think through what we do through the lens of what's going to be effective - but also through what's critical for US security interests."


Since taking office, Obama launched more belligerence than all his predecessors. He's not shy about initiating more. As a result, his comments ring hollow, especially given his record as a serial liar. Believe nothing he says.


On March 5, Russia Today (RT) headlined, "Stratfor leaks: NATO commandos in illegal special ops in Syria," saying.

According to hacked Stratfor emails released by WikiLeaks, NATO forces already operate covertly in Syria. The company's analysis director, Reva Bhalla, wrote them for internal use.


They discusses "a confidential Pentagon meeting in December." Allegedly, senior US, UK and French analysts attended. Western powers categorically denied involvement. It's known they've been supplying opposition forces with heavy weapons for months.


Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:

Attorney For Freedom