Article Image
News Link • Bill of Rights

A Dangerous Mind?

• New York Times
Because Mr. Mehanna’s conviction was based largely on things he said, wrote and translated. Yet that speech was not prosecuted according to the Brandenburg standard of incitement to “imminent lawless action” but according to the much more troubling standard of having the intent to support a foreign terrorist organization. 

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by Ed Price
Entered on:

Is the article complete and truthful in what it is saying? If so, is Mr. Mehanna going to appeal?

Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: