Article Image
News Link • Climate Change

IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk

• arclein
C lead authors fail to give "due consideration ... to properly documented alternative views" (p. 20), fail to "provide detailed written responses to the most significant review issues identified by the Review Editors" (p. 21), and are not "consider[ing] review comments carefully and document[ing] their responses" (p. 22). In plain English: the IPCC reports are not peer-reviewed.

Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: