The subsequent day, representatives from two conservative suppose tanks printed weblog posts defending Google and attacking the article's name for antitrust enforcement. Each suppose tanks have obtained funding from Google. Each weblog posts referenced research by a professor who has obtained funding from Google. In a single submit, the research referenced was printed in a quarterly journal owned by third suppose tank, which has additionally obtained funding from Google.
In a company-wide assembly a few weeks later, on March 1, Google's public coverage crew described the weblog posts because the fruits of Google's efforts to construct deeper relationships with conservatives, based on an audio recording of the assembly reviewed by WIRED. The recording of a contentious hour-long assembly affords a window into how Google thinks about its relationships in Washington, DC, its sensitivity to claims of political bias, and the way executives clarify to workers actions that some view as at odds with Google's values.
The assembly was led by Google's US director of public coverage, Adam Kovacevich, who defined that the corporate needed to modify its government-relations technique after Donald Trump was elected, significantly since Republicans additionally management the Home and Senate. "I feel one of many directives we have gotten very clearly from Sundar [Pichai, Google's CEO], his management is to construct deeper relationships with conservatives," Kovacevich stated. "I feel we have acknowledged that the corporate is usually seen as liberal by policymakers."