Article Image
News Link • Science, Medicine and Technology

The Smart Gun Doesn't Exist for the Dumbest Reasons

• https://www.bloomberg.com

Firearms makers have resisted Silicon Valley-sponsored digital innovation that could transform public safety.

Smith & Wesson still feels the wound it suffered two decades ago when it decided to invent smart guns.

The idea was to invest heavily in the development of personalized weapons that could be fired only by a single person: the gun's owner. This was considered a nearly science-fictional proposition in the late 1990s, years before the world was filled with smartphones and finger sensors. But consumer backlash against the project drove the gunmaker to the verge of ruin, and Smith & Wesson recently told shareholders that the corporate bleeding touched off by this long-ago episode has never fully stopped. "Sales still suffer from this misstep," the company said in a February filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The ordeal also didn't lead to technical breakthroughs, and Smith & Wesson never brought a smart gun to market. Nor has Sturm, Ruger & Co., Remington, Colt, Winchester, Mossberg, or Glock. It's not clear that any other major gunmaker has seriously tried.

No one involved can quite agree on who's to blame for the standstill. Gun manufacturers fault difficult-to-navigate technology. Investors and entrepreneurs are sure that restrictive legislation has created a dead end. Politicians blame each other.

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by chris gill
Entered on:

S&W troubles had little to do with the smart gun tech but the selling of the corporate soul to the Clinton anti gun criminal racket

Comment by chris gill
Entered on:

S&W troubles had little to do with the smart gun tech but the selling of the corporate soul to the Clinton anti gun criminal racket


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


Attorney For Freedom