By Frosty Wooldridge
Shannon O’Neil, last week, wrote a Perspective column in the
Denver Post advocating “We’ll need more immigrants” which illustrates his appalling
negligence of the facts facing
Colorado, California, Arizona, Texas and
America.
His first egregious misinformation stems form his contention
that
Mexico
possesses a 2.2 fertility rate. Wrong! It continues at 4.3
children per female.
That equals a 1.7 percent annual increase from its current
population. It grew from 50 to 104
million in the last century and will grow to 216 million by 2046 on its way to
a half billion people.
Source: According to Kimball, the population of
Mexico will be
approximately
500 million in the year 2100.
Mexico; population growth
predictions
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/P/Populations.html
What does that mean for
Colorado? We’re expected to grow from 4.3
million to 9.7 million by 2050.
California expects an
added 40 million people.
Arizona expects five
million more people! Ninety percent
driven by immigration! Source:
Fogel/Martin March 2006, “US Population Projections.”
What does that mean to our citizens? You can expect twice the toxic air
pollution. You will suffer a 90 mile
long traffic jam on weekends from
Denver
to Vail for skiing and camping. Adding
six million people to
Colorado
creates irreversible dilemmas and unsolvable problems. How about compaction of housing, roads and
people? What about quality of life as we
become a beehive?
Arizona, already so dry a man can't spit, will find itself bone dry with few options. The air over Phoenix, already thick with toxins, will grow worse with an added five million people. Why go there?
What about social, emotional and spiritual consequences? How about water shortages growing beyond our
ability to solve them? Why go
there? Any great reasoning behind adding
six million people to
Colorado? Five million to Arizona?
How about
Colorado
losing another 3.1 million acres of farmland by 2022 to development as reported
in the Denver Post? How will we grow
crops without viable farmland and without water for irrigation?
At the same time O’Neil advocates more immigrants, the
USA expects to
add 100 million people by 2040, which is 33 years from now.
California
expects 40 million added people by 2050. That multiples all of our current water, air,
crowding, food, energy and other problems by 100 million. What exactly is the point? What is the benefit?
At what point does this kind of thinking deal with
reality? At what point won’t we need to
add another 100 million people upon the 100 million we just added? When will we understand that we can’t use 20th
century thinking to solve 21st century problems?
One of the greatest minds of the 20th century
said, “The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved
with the level of thinking that created them.” Einstein
With all the consequences reported by the Denver Post of our
current problems, I wonder what, why and who drives this population
juggernaut? What’s the ultimate
purpose? Who wins as they sit in
gridlocked traffic breathing ever thicker toxic air? What Coloradan likes paying escalating gas
prices from a finite supply of oil? What’s so great as cost of living accelerates that leaves increasing
numbers of Americans in poverty?
What Arizona resident wants another five million people?
When will we not need any more immigrants? When will we come to a balanced, sustainable
number of people in
Colorado, California, Arizona, Texas and
America?
If we continue growing ourselves with immigrants, this
“Human Katrina” crashing ashore creates victims and survivors.
Does Senator John McCain possess a brain? Do any Congressional reps in the Southwest understand that water stands as the greatest obstacle to insane growth by immigration? Why won't McCain use his brain by advocating a 10 year moratorium on all immigration? If not now, when?
Why should this country want to add more consequences? Why do to ourselves what
China,
India
and
Bangladesh
did to themselves? Why drive our
civilization over a cliff?
We can’t save the world, however, we can destroy our civilization.