What does the North American Union, the European Union, IMF, World Bank, GATT, WTO, NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA, CANAMEX, NASCO, CODEX, the present state of American health care, The United States Conference of Mayors, The National Governor’s Association, The American Legislative Exchange Council, The Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Department of Education, No Child Left Behind legislation, the EPA, hate speech legislation, multiculturalism, Smart Growth, The FDA, The Federal Reserve, the global warming “crisis,” amnesty legislation, the rise of the American corporatocracy, record numbers of eminent domain proceedings, genetically modified foods, the implementation of communitarian law, the Earth Charter, the declining standard of living of the American middle class, the draconian police state tactics of Patriot Acts I & II and the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the unrestricted use of highly volatile fiat money have to do with each other?
All of the abovementioned are inextricably interwoven into a United Nations program, known as Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is in nearly every country and in nearly every city and county in
Einstein died before he could discover his long sought after Unified Field Theory which, if successfully developed, would have been the “be-all, end-all” theory of quantum physics. Although Einstein fell short of his goal of discovering a unified field theory, the world does possess a Unified Field Theory, of sorts, in the realm of global and nation-state management. It is commonly called, Agenda 21. Agenda 21 was ratified by 179 nation-state signatories, along with the
Agenda 21 contains 40 chapters of goals in which the United Nations is in the process of implementing, both globally and within the
Agenda 21 is the global contract which binds governments around the world to the UN plan, all under the noble banner of saving the earth. Let’s not fool ourselves; this is the creation of global government. Under Agenda 21, no one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system (Sovereignty. Net, 2007). In a dramatic case of truth being stranger than fiction, nearly 60 years later, George Orwell’s predictions about the creation of such a far-reaching police state, are being realized in our time.
The existence of Agenda 21 (i.e., global management for the 21st century) was originally made public at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in
Agenda 21 makes excellent use of doomsday earth change predictions, cataclysmic climatic predictions and true to the Hegelian Dialectic, a management program designed to meet the pseudo challenges of the 21st century which includes a detailed management plan of resource and property reallocation in what can best be described as an inverse Robin Hood approach in which the rich rob from the middle class and the poor.
Maurice Strong, in his opening speech at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development and Bio-diversity clearly unveiled the true agenda of Agenda 21 when he told attendees “ consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing, are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations..." In other words, all middle class Americans are having their earning power and consumption habits targeted for a dramatic and drastic reduction.
But wait, this is
When one considers that every state has political infighting, isn’t it amazing that much of the legislation in one state uses almost the same language as similar legislation in the other 49 states? For example, Smart Growth is Smart Growth whether it is in
It is noteworthy, that the overwhelming focus of the legislation, from these three groups concern land management modifications, property rights issues and resource protection and reallocation of the same. In a later part of this series, Local Agenda 21 and its implementation in
The Founding Fathers understood, all too well, the dangers of sacrificing American federalism to a centralized power and much of their past writings warned of sacrificing local control of government. For example, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay were three of the guiding forces behind the creation of the United States Constitution. Their uncompromising position stated that federalism and the subsequent 10th Amendment were put into place to protect the properties and liberties of all American citizens. They stated, "The powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, [such] as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people (Hamilton,
The founding fathers were clear in their intent that local people remain sovereign in their affairs with regard to property and liberty. However, the PCSD is using the power of the federal government in order to usurp the sovereign decision making of all Americans at the local level. The sound you hear are the Founding Fathers rolling over in their graves.
For all intents and purposes, the protections of federalism are on life support. Every American community stands naked in the face of Agenda 21. The PCSD (1996) stated that "Federal and state governments—in consultation with local government, the private sector, and nongovernmental organizations—should support local planning that integrates economic development, land use, and social equity concerns and engages significant public participation….” The latter refers to the management of human resources through the consensus process (i.e., stakeholders) within the planned civil society. All Americans should take note that “consultation,” by the federal government with local governments, is not the same as obtaining “consent.” Further, the language in the abovementioned PCSD (e.g., stakeholders) quote are strikingly similar to the unelected decision-making councils called "Soviets" which was so prevalent in Communist nations from 1948-1988. And the term “social equity” is a common euphemism for equality under the communist system of government. And, my good comrades, you thought communism died the day the Berlin Wall was toppled.
Today under George W. Bush, the sustainable development policies of Agenda 21 have overwhelmed and infiltrated every county in the country with the help of these three aforementioned legislative organizations. By now, you must be wondering what is the end game? What do the people behind the United Nations want for
Part two of this series will take a look at how the United Nations and its corporate and banking cronies are trying to privatize nearly everything, including the use and ownership of water, even rain water.
Sovereignty.net (2007). http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/a21/. (retrieved June 13-17, 2007).
The United Nations (2007b). www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/index.htm (retrieved June 13-17, 2007.
Volcker, Paul (1979). New York Times, 18 October 1979, p.1, Volcker Asserts U.S. Must Trim Living Standard.