IPFS Chuck Baldwin

Food For Thought

More About: Philosophy: Political

Push For Globalism Continues

Visit Chuck's Website: Chuck Baldwin Live

This column is archived at

When George W. Bush was President, he greatly advanced the prospect of integrating the United States with a North American Union (NAU). With no thanks to most Christian conservatives or the mainstream news media, hundreds of thousands of patriotic Americans rallied against this proposal and--at least temporarily--seriously stymied Bush's draconian dream. But if you thought President Barack Obama would be content to let the NAU die a natural death, think again.

Reporting for World Net Daily, author/researcher Jerome Corsi recently reported, "President Obama is continuing President George W. Bush's effort to advance North American integration with a public-relations makeover calculated to place the program under the radar of public opinion and to deflect concerns about border security and national sovereignty.

"The Obama administration has 'rebranded' and 'refocused' the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to advance the Bush administration's agenda of North American integration under the rubric of the "North American Leaders Summit,' a less controversial banner, according to confidential sources in the U.S. Department of Commerce and State Department who agreed to speak with WND only if their comments were kept off the record."

As further evidence of President Obama's determination to continue the Bush policy of a commercial union between countries (or "League of Democracies" as John McCain called it), Corsi also reported, "President Obama has actively backtracked on his campaign promises to renegotiate NAFTA to get provisions more favorable to American workers."

Corsi also wrote, "In the Ohio and Pennsylvania Democratic Party primaries, candidate Obama had pledged to renegotiate NAFTA as part of his appeal to workers in the states that have lost manufacturing jobs under the free trade agreements negotiated by Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush."

However, Obama is now viewed as reneging on that campaign promise by appointing University of Chicago economics professor, Austan Goolsbee, as chief economist and staff director of the newly created Presidential Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is chaired by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker. Obama also appointed Goolsbee to the Council of Economic Advisors, or CEA, which is charged with assisting in the development of White House economic policy, according to Corsi.

Readers should know that Goolsbee is a fellow traveler of Robert Pastor, longtime professor at American University. And readers should well remember that Pastor is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and one of the chief promoters and architects of the NAU. Of course, Volcker is also a member of the CFR. In fact, at last count, President Obama has appointed at least 20 members of the CFR to key positions within his cabinet and administration.

Back in June of 2006, I interviewed Dr. Corsi regarding Bush's attempts to merge America into a North American Union. To listen to that interview, go here:


Ever since the administrations of George Herbert Walker Bush and Bill Clinton, one fact remains constant: regardless of petty partisan differences, the push for globalism continues. Both Bush administrations (Republican) and the Clinton and Obama administrations (Democrat) enthusiastically have embraced and endorsed the doctrines and principles of global unification. That equates to more than two decades of determined effort by both Republican and Democratic Presidential administrations to compromise U.S. sovereignty and independence. It also helps explain why neither recent Republican nor Democratic Presidential administrations have had any intention of securing our borders and putting a stop to illegal immigration--and why they all promoted the creation of the NAFTA superhighway.

And just as George W. Bush was willing to betray conservatives and Christians in order to achieve global unification, so, too, Barack Obama is willing to betray union workers and America's tradesmen in order to accomplish the same agenda.

When will the American people wake up and realize that for the last twenty years, both major political parties (at the national level) have been co-opted by globalists and internationalists who have no respect or appreciation for U.S. sovereignty, and who desire to create world government? When will they look past party labels and start seeing these globalists for what they really are: traitors to the principles enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and upon which America was established?

I urge readers to watch very carefully--and prepare to vigorously resist--as Obama attempts to finalize what his predecessors started: the complete implementation of a North American Union and related globalization. You won't find this information in the mainstream news media, of course. It will take independent writers and reporters to keep us abreast of these developments, and this we fully and faithfully intend to do.

In the meantime, know that those of us who believe in an independent and sovereign United States of America still do not have a friend in the White House--political party label notwithstanding.

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:


© Chuck Baldwin

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by TL Winslow
Entered on:

I don't know what globalism means in the fact of the little ole stumbling blocks out there like Islam, Russia, India and Pakistan, Indochina, and the Commie Chinese, but when it comes to North America, what's wrong with the big three countries in the New World finding ways to work together better? It's a plot by bankers? I would hope so. If they could figure out how everybody could make more money, they could sell more credit card deals.

The right-wingers who shout Boo at the NAU are really mainly white supremacists who really want to deflect attention from the real issue, namely, Mexican bean, er, brown people. They know that the U.S. has until recently been run by white supremacists, and can't stand that white supremacy is kaput, but want to keep it going by any subterfuge available, hence the Big Bad EN AY YOU is on the table. Sorry, I don't buy it. It's time for the U.S. to finally accept the existence of them pesky Mexicans and learn to share the New World with them in peace, avoiding all the mistakes history teaches us happen when hate and xenophobia are fanned instead of calm cool reason taking over.

Now is the time to get the issue over with, by Congress inviting the Mexican people to finally unite with the U.S. as 10+ new states sans racism under the U.S. Constitution, after the real problem, the ever-corrupt Mexican govt. is dissolved by mutual consent. Talking about bankers, guess who allows Mexican fatcats to launder their ill-gotten gains through U.S. banks?

Click http://go.to/megamerge to read my exciting Megamerge Dissolution Solution proposal showing the hows and whys of U.S.-Mexican megamerge. Once the U.S. gains 760K sq. mi. of new territory and the world doesn't end and the U.S. actually gets stronger, the NAU Scare will be a dead fish, ahaha.