> Anne Tompkins: Tyranny's Whore - Freedoms Phoenix 
Larken Rose

More About: Federal Reserve

Anne Tompkins: Tyranny's Whore

Is there any limit to how stupid statist propaganda can get? There doesn't seem to be.

In the modern vernacular of the U.S.S.A., wanting to be left alone makes you a "terrorist," while wanting to meddle in everyone else's lives by way of the violence of "government" (a la Emperor Obama) makes you a "progressive, concerned leader." And unfortunately, it seems the American public, for the most part, mindlessly agrees with and repeats such idiocy.

As a sickening example, twelve colossal morons (also known as a "jury") recently declared one man to be a criminal, for having had the gall to mint silver coins, and suggest that people should trade with silver, instead of with the crumbling "dollar." No, what the man did was not immoral, or fraudulent, or even against the stupid "laws" of this stupid "nation," but it is against the interests of the international banking cartel, which owns Congress and all its little mercenaries ... like Anne Tompkins.

Anne Tompkins is a U.S. Attorney, appointed by Emperor Obama, who prosecuted Bernard von NotHaus of the "Liberty Dollar." In a statement about the case after the conviction, the evil Nazi jackass--I mean, "public servant"--characterized what Mr. NotHaus did as trying to "undermine the legitimate currency of this country." Those who understand anything about currency will see the amazing irony in the comment. For everyone else:

1) The "official" system of counterfeiting run by the Federal Reserve, with the blessing of the maggots in Congress, is about as illegitimate, in every way imaginable, as a currency could possibly be.

2) Being a fiat currency, the counterfeit monopoly money we use is perpetually "undermining" itself. The only way to undermine a currency that is backed by nothing is to print more of it--which is exactly what the Fed does all the time, and what the guy being prosecuted never did.

3) Precious metals are "legitimate" currency--and the only legitimate currency around. You can't delegitimize what is already illegitimate by doing something legitimate. (Duh.)

But wait, it gets better (or worse). Anne "Goebbels" Tompkins then went on to describe this alleged "undermining" of the fraudulent counterfeit currency system as a form of "domestic terrorism." Yes, she said that. So trying to trade using a medium that isn't completely fake and bogus makes you a terrorist, whereas defrauding and enslaving several hundred million people via large-scale counterfeiting and credit fraud--and crashing an entire economy in the process--counts as a "legitimate" type of currency.

But just in case Fuhrer Tompkins might still have had any competition for the Fascist Sock-Puppet of the Year Award, she added that, although such "anti-government activities" (trading in silver) "do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country."

Ms. Tompkins, please do the world a favor and go play in traffic, you braindead, soul-less fascist pig.  Whether she was stupid enough to believe what she said, or whether she was just hoping the public is stupid enough to believe it, she is, in every sense of the term, tyranny's whore. (Sorry if that wasn't "civil discourse.")

Think I'm being too harsh? This parasitic swine worked hard to put someone in a cage (for how long remains to be seen) for doing the only thing that had any prayer of saving the economy of this country: trading without using the counterfeit, fraudulent rags cranked out by the Federal Reserve. And then she claimed that real trade, using a real medium of exchange, poses a danger to the "economic stability" of the country, and constitutes "terrorism."

Want to hear about a real example of terrorism? A while back Fuhrer Tompkins' happy little underling thugs did a paramilitary invasion of the "Liberty Dollar" offices, and stole millions of dollars in silver and gold, belonging to many different people. (Many people held certificates for the silver and gold that was held in the "Liberty Dollar's" vaults.) That's called armed robbery. And now the federal fascists are trying to steal it permanently via "forfeiture" proceedings in court.

There isn't an insult bad enough to describe Ms. Tompkins and her fellow thugs, kidnappers, robbers and terrorists (at least, not an insult I want to publish here). The fact that she is an "official" terrorist and thief, that her theft and kidnapping is labelled "legal," and that she was just "doing her job" like a good little fascist, doesn't make her actions any better than the common thug on the street. (Hitmen for the Mafia are also just "doing their job.") In my book, Ms. Tompkins and her fellow federales are one step lower than the average carjacker because they hide behind the excuses of "law" and "authority" to commit their evil, while pretending that they bear no personal responsibility for their actions.

Ms. Tompkins, YOU are the terrorist, YOU are the one destroying the economy, YOU are the one undermining and attacking everything decent and noble, even if you're too damn stupid to realize it. And if you're ever unfortunate enough to try to victimize someone who resorts to violence as quickly and as often as you and your fellow jackboots do, you will deserve the fate that finds you, you Nazi bitch.

Oh, and have a nice day.


6 Comments in Response to

Comment by Nomad Capitalist
Entered on:

...or someone who uses violence as often as thugs like Anne CLAIM they do.

Comment by Gimmel Yod
Entered on:

Great post - as usual.  my only minor critique would be about the language you used -- being Far to TAME & CIVIL -- for such a "Nazi bitch". . .

Comment by Zeke Layman
Entered on:

I know I'm not speaking to the choir, but Larken is correct in vilifying Anne Tompkins and the rest of the Attorney Generals Office and officers as Tyranny whores, terrorists, and basically scum sucking idiots that they are.

The challenge I see for Larken and many others is that, "wanting to be left alone" is a concept that requires action, not the lack thereof. By this I mean that because of the way people interact with each other, the reality of these interactions is that your silence is consent. If you don't disagree, you agree. That is why action is necessary.

Aside from the necessity of taking action, more importantly is taking the proper action. As it turns out, our constitutional process allows for two kinds of actions to be brought in the courts. One is civil, and the other is criminal. A criminal action can only be brought "at law", but a civil action can be brought at law or "in equity".

What this means is that when the government comes against an individual like Larken or Bernard, the individuals do not have a remedy in that court and their defenses are not heard by that court, although they like to let you think you have a chance.

The remedy in both Larken's and Bernard's cases is an equitable one that must be filed in a separate, collateral, civil acton to restrain the individuals, personally, not in the capacity of any job. The Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or Preliminary Injunction is found at Rule 65(b)F.R.C.P. and is what the Judges of the Supreme Court said is the process used in Foreclosures, Forfeitures and Rights violations. I found this in a "note" under RuleE 4(f) which says:

“Rule E(4)(f) is triggered by the defendant or any other person with an interest in the property seized. Upon an oral or written application similar to that used in seeking a temporary restraining order, see Rule 65(b), the court is required to hold a hearing as promptly as possible to determine whether to allow the arrest or attachment to stand. The plaintiff has the burden of showing why the seizure should not be vacated. The hearing also may determine the amount of security to be granted or the propriety of imposing counter- ‐security to protect the defendant from an improper seizure.”

Now you can see why I said I knew I was not talking to the choir, this is extremely secret, legal, knowledge that I have discovered through decades of research. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know exactly how one goes about obtaining these restraining orders and injunctions, but I can tell you one thing for sure, this is exactly WHAT each of us needs in order to secure our freedom and liberty. HOW to obtain this ORDER is for all of us to discover.

For more information you can check out my pdf at: http://powerpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Power-Politics-E-Book-II-An-Equitable-Remedy.pdf

Comment by Don Duncan
Entered on:

Does it make me a "terrorist" also if I spend or receive "liberty dollars" in trade? Even FDR wasn't this bad. He warned people with an executive order before making gold "illegal". We didn't even get that!

In claiming that silver undermines paper did Anne admit that fiat money is inferior? Did she infer that if given a choice people would use metal over paper?  I think so. Can the fascists force paper on us if we resist? I think NOT.  This is a bluff that begs to be called. 

 

 

Comment by James Babb
Entered on:

LOVE it! It's nice to see someone give her the respect she deserves.

Comment by Stupid Amerkin
Entered on:

 Hey Larkin: So right on. I was just thinking the other day how unbelievable it is that a criminal cartel like the fed can print up and create worthless fraudlent notes of debt that the sleeple sheeple buy into while they lock up a man who produces something of real value. Are we living in the Twilight Zone?

We need to wake up and learn the lesson the people in the Middle East are teaching us.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy