Frosty Wooldridge


More About: Politics: General Activism

Republicans must choose pro-choice

Both parties run our country over a financial cliff, wreck us environmentally, fail to generate jobs for over 14 million Americans and culturally destroy our country with endless immigration.  The list grows.
One wonders why any American voted for either party’s candidates. 
Our U.S. Congress provides the finest example of the Peter Principle—total incompetence.  Both candidates should have lost.  A third party candidate would do a better job because it’s obvious that democrats and republicans have failed the American people for two decades.
As the vote showed, 51 percent to 49 percent, we share a divided country.  Half hate Obama and the other half ride on his ability to provide welfare, food stamps, government jobs, assisted housing, amnesties and free medical care.  From 36 million to 47 million Americans now subsist on food stamps during Obama’s first term. A lot of folks cannot secure a job and a lot of folks like a free ride.
“Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”

With such a failed four years by Obama, how did he win another term in the obvious light of his incompetence?  Answer: he enjoyed the majority-minority welfare vote. Folks love getting things for free.  But of particular note, Obama captured all those women who demand pro-choice. 
At some point, the Republican Party must evolve out of the Dark Ages and accept Pro-Choice as a single, viable right for millions of women in America.  No one can legislate morality, ethics or personal choices.  Around the world, 46 million women annually choose abortion. They choose it because they cannot provide for another child.  They choose it because they cannot secure birth control.  They choose it because they suffer desperation of their poverty.
Notice that whenever a republican president reaches the White House, he kills the annual $180 million given to International Family Planning and birth control.  Republicans represent modern day moral troglodytes.   They never think about the 10 million children that starve to death annually around the globe because of the lack of birth control.
I remember my college years in 1965, when rich girls became pregnant, they took “Mercy flights” to Great Britain and returned un-pregnant.  The poor however, delivered babies by the truck load.  Their poverty became cyclical and horrific. 
At the same time, 1.2 million American women turned to backroom medical butchers for abortions.  Some doctors provided abortions, but feared for their licenses from capricious women who might expose them.
Finally, in 1972, the Supreme Court provided Roe vs. Wade and gave women a choice.  Today, women may visit a Family Planning Clinic for counseling to either keep the baby or choose to terminate it.  It’s got to be a terribly distressing situation and choice either way. 
But, by God, republicans and the religious right condemn it and vote to send those female sinners to the gates of hell.  What they don’t understand about choice is this: it’s none of their business.   It’s no one’s business how you eat even if you are so obese you are killing yourself.  (You ARE killing yourself, too.)  It’s no one’s business if you smoke or get drunk every night in an ongoing attempt to kill yourself.  It’s no one’s business if you smoke pot or not.   
Finally, your morality cannot be applied to anyone else
If the Republican Party expects to continue as viable, it must evolve into the 21st century.  It must deal with reality.  It must grant women their personal choices and its leaders must move to a pro-choice platform.  It needs to stop its “nanny-state” caretaking as to abortion, drugs and gay marriage.
If it fails to evolve, it will proceed at a rapid speed toward extinction.  The fact remains as Thomas Jefferson said, “A republic provides for the tyranny of the majority.”  In this case, the majority of women demand pro-choice.  Republicans either get onto the train or they will be left behind standing on the railroad tracks of the past.
Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents - from the Arctic to the South Pole - as well as eight times across the USA, coast to coast and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle, Norway to Athens, Greece. In 2012, he bicycled coast to coast across America.  His latest book is: How to Live a Life of Adventure: The Art of Exploring the World by Frosty Wooldridge, copies at 1 888 280 7715/ Motivational program: How to Live a Life of Adventure: The Art of Exploring the World by Frosty Wooldridge, click:

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by Ed Price
Entered on:

Pro-choice among the women of the world is only the tip of the iceberg. Obama's acceptance of pro-choice among women - especially targeted at getting the vote from pro-choice women welfare recipients - is only the tip of the iceberg with regard to Obama's pro-choice campaign.

You see, what pro-choice is when it is used in an abortion, is killing another human being. Obama endorses pro-choice every day.

Obama uses pro-choice by endorsing SWAT's using of anti-Constitutional methods to do no-knock raids that frequently wind up killing an innocent person right at the person's own home.

Obama uses pro-choice by ordering our troops around the world, with calloused disregard for human life, to make slaves of people of other nations.

Obama uses pro-choice by deploying drones in Pakistan and other countries, knowing full well that there are going to be many innocent people killed.

Probably Obama wouldn't mind if anybody in the good ol' USA went out and killed anybody else. Why? PRO-CHOICE.

Obama is so extremely unfair by enforcing pro-choice among women, but not allowing it among the men. I mean, it was the man who didn't want the woman to get pregnant in the first place, right? But the woman did it anyway, even though it wasn't in the agreement, and might have been totally against the agreement. Pro-choice should allow the man to kill the woman for not following through with her part of the agreement, right? Frosty would agree if he had thought it through this far.

The point is, Frosty would turn us all into barbarians. He advertizes national and world chaos among people by suggesting that pro-choice/murder should be the norm. He wants to break down world populations any way that he can - even killing - simply because he has a wicked heart... but more than likely because he is getting paid to do it.

Frosty is good at his job. With all due respect to his mother, he probably has her convinced by now, that she made the wrong pro-choice decision all those years ago. He almost has the rest of us convinced, as well.

Comment by Ross Wolf
Entered on:

Americans Vote for Obama to get Free Stuff

When Obama Looks in the Mirror, Does Obama see Socialist President Hugo Chavez?

In 1998, when the notorious Socialist Hugo Chavez was campaigning for president of Venezuela, he was short thousands of votes to win. Previously Venezuelan poor did not largely vote. Chavez promised the poor if elected President, the Government would spend billions on welfare and other social-programs to help Venezuelans. Chavez said government could pay for these programs by increasing and levying new taxes on high income Venezuelans and businesses. Chavez won the Venezuelan Presidential election after huge numbers of poor voted for him.

In 2008 when Obama was running for President he promised the poor unprecedented expansion of welfare and entitlements. Like Hugo Chavez— Obama said U.S. Government could pay for his social programs by taxing higher income Americans.

Since Obama’s 2008 presidential election it is clear that if U.S. Government does not stop deficit spending and borrowing, America will be too broke to sustain either its welfare programs or a sufficient military to protect the Nation. The only promise Obama kept was to “level the playing field” for the people—Obama has turned millions of Americans into beggars, setting the stage for millions of Americans to accept a hybrid form of Marxist-socialism.  America is separating into two distinct  groups; those that work and pay their own way and those that don’t that live off Free Stuff paid for by taxpayers. It used to be when you met people at parties you would ask what line of work are you in? Now the question is, do you work or live off the Taxpayers?  America is TRAPPED: Obama will increasingly need to raise taxes on working Americans and businesses to pay for Free Stuff demanded by his constituency—in addition to unaffordable ObamaCare health insurance costs forced on Americans and businesses that increasingly will cause higher unemployment, inhibit investment in America and impede businesses hiring new employees. Obama appears to believe crushing small businesses with higher taxes will transfer wealth to the workers. Workers can’t work for bankrupt employers. Obama’s current economic polices will create vast unemployment forcing more Americans onto the street to beg government for Free Stuff.

In 2012 socialist dictator Hugo Chavez was reelected by a small margin. Chavez stated he would now step up nationalization of private companies including taking over banks and financial institutions. May observers believe Chavez’s take over of financial institutions will result in international loss of confidence in Venezuelan currency; that private companies will be forced to sell their assets to dictator Hugo Chavez for pennies on the dollar; at some point Chavez’s government will collapse after it runs out of other people’s money.

The Obama Government has already run out of taxpayer money. While Obama begs the Communist Chinese Government for loans he is relentless to raise Americans’ taxes to pay for his out of control spending which appears unstoppable.


Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: