Chomsky's Misinformation on Syria
by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org - Home - Stephen Lendman)
Noted academic, father of modern linguistics, political/anti-war activist Noam Chomsky disturbingly supported Hillary in 2016, saying "I don't think there's any other rational choice."
At the time, I called it a disturbing statement by someone who knows better. Money-controlled duopoly power runs America, a one-party state with two extremist right wings.
They're in lockstep on issues mattering most, including support for endless wars of aggression and corporate empowerment over the general welfare.
There's nothing democratic about undemocratic Dems. There's no "other rational choice" than rejecting both wings of one-party rule, tyranny masquerading as democracy they abhor, supporting revolutionary change by grassroots activism, taking to the streets, resisting tyranny - the choice between living free or exploited the way things are now.
Chomsky is wrong on Syria, claiming Putin "is trying to restore some degree of Russian power in the world, some degree of Russian authority. One extension of that and, in fact, the only one is the Russian position in Syria."
Kremlin involvement in Syria is largely a Russian security issue, wanting the scourge of US-supported terrorism prevented from spreading to Russia's heartland.
It's not about propping up Assad. Putin's responsibility is serving and protecting Russian interests, not those of Syria or any other countries.
Assad isn't "a horrible war criminal," as Chomsky falsely claimed. Nor are the "bulk of the atrocities (in the country) his responsibility," adding:
"There's no justifying Assad," a deplorable statement about a leader, overwhelmingly supported by Syrians, involved for nearly eight years in combating US aggression and terrorists Washington created and supports. Chomsky failed to address all of the above.
Opposition forces are jihadists, cutthroat killers, imported from scores of countries - armed, funded, trained and directed by US special forces, CIA operatives, and their imperial counterparts.
They're not moderate "rebels," none of them, Chomsky adding "(t)he current situation is that Assad has pretty much won the war, like it or not."
"There was in the early stages a democratic secular, quite respectable opposition, but they were very quickly overwhelmed by the jihadi elements, supported from the outside" - the US and its imperial allies.
Democratic secular elements don't use violence in pursuit of their aims - not in Syria or anywhere else.
War was planned, orchestrated and launched by Washington, supported by NATO, Israel, the Saudis, UAE, Qatar, Jordan and Turkey - using jihadists to wage dirty war.
There was no popular uprising as falsely reported. From its onset, there's been nothing civil about what's going on - a US regime change plot, all of the above ignored by Chomsky, what's most important about endless war in the country.
He shamefully claimed "it makes sense for the United States to maintain a presence (in Syria) which would deter an attack on the Kurdish areas" - failing to explain the US illegally occupies northern and southern parts of the country.
Kurds are threatened by Turkey, not Assad. Allying with him is their best defense, especially with Russian support if forthcoming.
Referring to legitimate Syrian governance as "the murderous Assad regime" is a disgraceful perversion of truth.
Tim Anderson's book, titled "The Dirty War on Syria" is the definitive account of the conflict. Separately, he explained Obama's dirty war, now Trump's, as follows, saying:
"Washington and its allies try another 'regime change' in Syria. A fake 'revolution' uses Islamic gangs, during an 'Arab Spring.' The Western media constantly lie about this covert, dirty war."
"A political reform movement is driven off the streets by Islamic violence. (The misnamed pro-Western) 'Free Syrian Army' slaughters minorities and government workers."
"Saudi and Qatari backed Islamists carry out a series of massacres, falsely blaming them on the Syrian Army and President Assad."
"Most of Syria's opposition backs the state and army against terrorism. Washington calls a puppet exile group 'the Syrian opposition.' "
"Washington (using Saudis, Qatar, Turkey and Israel) backs all the armed Islamist groups, pretending some are 'moderate rebels.' "
"A resistance coalition rallies to Syria. Iran, Hezbollah, Iraq and Russia join the Syrian Army in destroying western backed terrorist groups."
Anderson's book explains all of the above and more in detail, why it's essential reading to understand what's going on – polar opposite media propaganda, notably Chomsky's misinformation as well.
Syria, its people, and government are victims of US aggression. What's most important to explain, Chomsky ignored.
VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at firstname.lastname@example.org.
My newest book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."