![]() |
|
FEATURE ARTICLE |
|
|
|
From Russia With Love
Ernest Hancock Website: www.ernesthancock.com Date: 12-31-2012 Subject: Gun Rights These days, there are very few things to admire about the
socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so
far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to
defend one’s self and possessions. This will probably come as a total shock to most of my
Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily
armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under
the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and
shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed,
they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of
many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the
costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are
bullet holders for rifles. Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of
Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state
collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that
holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking
was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding,
one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on
exterminating or driving out the aggression This well armed population was what allowed the various White
factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and
militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the
Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants,
villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not
been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history
would have gone quite differently. Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to
defend it, but from the lieing guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took
Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and
their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high.
However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military
officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons
and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed.
The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene.
They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register
themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot. Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean
being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One
of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that
point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder,
mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst
they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or
the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers. To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a
whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are
still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We
are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime
would be everywhere….but criminals are still armed and still murdering
and to often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the
uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is
also laughable when statistics are examined. While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local
authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to
act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical
class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively
unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute
contempt and often enough, criminal abuse. For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US
2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments
will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and
crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power
and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues
and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel
Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs
(everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they
throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the
best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or “talking to
them”, it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac,
because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves. The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also
plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is
full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please
explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and
came from the same culture? No it is about power and a total power over the people. There
is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the
Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed
and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that
progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is
guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their
ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves
and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have
slated for a barrel to the back of the ear. So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect. |