I sure am glad I**Q**m not responding to this story. It would be highly, shall we say, **QQ**balanced**QQ** to have crooked cops getting busted on television though. I mean, this isn**Q**t a response or anything, it**Q**s just my feeling that crooked and abusive cops need some more attention. More time in the limelight. After all, if you**Q**ve ever met a crooked cop, you know what incredibly great stage presence they have. It just makes for great television.

But I iterate, this does not constitute a **QQ**response**QQ**. I**Q**d call it a commentary, because that**Q**s what the button at the bottom of this form says. I**Q**m commenting, not responding. Or, I might reject the implied contract of the button as nominated, and declare that I am being satirical in which case I**Q**m protected if I suggest that every cop on scene showed up wearing their wives makeup and dresses and carrying porno mags and bongs. Because I can disclose the fact that I saw the video and there are clearly no bongs or porno present, much less anyone ostensibly dressed in women**Q**s clothing. Or talking with a lisp, or walking around with a certain flouncy bump in the badunkadunk.

To suggest that I**Q**ve personally interviewed officers who were on scene and who intimated to me that they**Q**d like to **QQ**meet young guys who like to party**QQ** would be pure fallacy on my part.

Similarly, to suggest that certain officers on scene told me privately that **QQ**they were just out to get a bust and go home**QQ** has no basis in fact, however, eyewitness and court record show that cops recently shoved the antenna of a police radio up the rectum of a subdued citizen suspected (not even charged) of a crime, and we fully know you will draw lethal weapons of food co-op people and their (correction, OUR) young children, so the fact is,

NOTHING I JUST SAID WOULD BE DIS-BELIEVED BY PEOPLE WHO HAVE A REAL FAMILIARITY WITH COPS.