I want to revisit this issue one last time … with a solution that I recommend – pork blood and the head of a pig!

Obama was using the Constitution to defend the religion of his Muslim brethren to construct a mosque wherever they want. More than 70% of the American people all over America disagreed that ground zero should be the location for the exercise of that constitutional right. It wounds the feelings of Americans, but Obama is "an insensitive lout", so let’s not argue about that.

Neither should we argue that Obama is a dye-in-the-wool believer of Islam. He grew up as a Muslim, a devoted Islamic disciple, since his childhood in Indonesia under the name Barry Soetero. That’s an open book.

What we should argue about – and let me lead the way on this if I may – is how Obama dares to use the Constitution without shame, to cover up his underground religious identity as a Muslim by defending the mosque against a tsunami of protests or attacks.

Let’s also use the Constitution to prove Obama is a donkey. The donkey we are referring to is a two-legged animal that resembles a horse with a large head but with a very little brain therefore lacks intelligence.

Like Obama, let’s also use the First Amendment against Obama – the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. We have this grievance directed to Obama who thinks he is a one-man government -- our right to protest against the construction of the mosque on ground zero.

To redress our grievances, we sprinkle the hallowed surface of the earth in ground zero with pig’s blood, and bury the head of a slaughtered pig underneath as a form of a religious ritual or belief under Obama’s freedom of religion. We have freedom of religion and religious belief just as the Muslims have – the holy sacrifice of a hog in the altar of the freedom of religion that Obama was so proud about in defending the construction of the mosque as an expression of religious freedom.

If we do this as a solution to this mosque problem, we fall squarely within the provisions of the Constitution’s First Amendment – freedom of religion, as well as the right to petition the government to redress our grievances. We have two, as against Obama’s one, of the First Amendment.

And we have more! We have the Tenth Amendment, the Rule of Construction of Constitution. Obama could no longer disparage our position.

Under this Tenth Amendment, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights [our rights to freedom of religion (the pig ritual) and to petition to redress grievances I have just mentioned], shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

We are that people, not like Muslims and their mosque, who neither act like people nor care about the vast majority of the American people; their religious terrorists invaded our land, specifically New York were they buried their more than 6,000 innocent victims beneath ground zero. Now they want to construct a mosque on ground zero to immortalize this infamy and celebrate their victory, eternally!

Actually, the building of the mosque is a covert continuation of Islam’s Jihad. The Imam who contaminated the mind of Muslims in New York and elsewhere with this mosque-germ of an idea, was treacherous – he was hiding the sword of Koran behind his back. This time the attack of terror led by this shady Imam is aimed at conquering the spirit of New York where their success of mass murder and mass destruction took place, because New York is today’s "Alamo" that rallies the entire nation against Islam’s religious war.

The compromise solution – the pork solution -- that I am offering here is not new, and it has been proven very effective once it is carried out properly.

The story goes that in the year 1911, Gen. John J. Pershing was in command of a garrison in Mindanao, Philippines. He was on top of his campaign in successfully suppressing Muslim terrorism. His problem was hordes of Filipino Muslim warriors [called "Moros"] kept on coming and attacking, and he kept on killing them to no avail. Those that were captured even begged to face the firing squad at the earliest time possible. Under their religious belief, to die for Allah would earn them a pass to heaven where they would claim their holy reward for eternal life.

A bright idea twinkled in Pershing’s mind. While lining up a column of prisoners against the wall for his firing squad, Pershing ordered his soldiers to slaughter pigs in front of captured Moros about to be shot. The execution soldiers "rubbed their bullets in the blood and fat" of the pig."

It terrified the Muslims who were about to die. Pershing was right … the prisoners saw that when they die, their spirit would be contaminated with the hog’s blood and they could not enter heaven.

Pershing executed all the prisoners in this manner, except one he released back to the Moros camp. The report said Muslim terrorism in the Philippines stopped "for the next 50 years". [Ref. and acknowledgement, Felimar Blanco, siagnon.com.]

Obama could not deny our right to religious freedom just as no one would deny Muslims of their right to religious freedom according to Obama. The Muslims expressed their religious right by building a mosque which, according to Obama, it could be anywhere they want.

In this solution that I am suggesting, we express our religious freedom using the head and blood of pig in a holly hog sacrifice as a form of a religious belief or ritual performed on ground zero. Here we use the word "perform", similar to the Muslims’ "construction" of the mosque on the same spot.

I am sure Obama and his Muslim brethren would kick the bucket by telling us to move our religious rituals away from ground zero. Hogs where the mosque is, would definitely hurt the feelings of Muslims all over the world.

But we couldn’t hear them no matter how loud they shout to high heavens, just as they didn’t hear us when we burst our lungs crying out in a thunderous protest to move the mosque away from ground zero because it was not the right place and our feelings were not only hurt but irreverently and disrespectfully injured.