U.S. law has long required you to declare the value of cash or other monetary instruments you carry across a U.S. border if the value exceeds $10,000. FinCEN Form 105 is used for this purpose. While there’s the possibility of a five-year prison sentence for failing to comply with the law, along with forfeiture of the “monetary instruments,” enforcement of these requirements is inconsistent.

Entering the United States, you must complete Customs Form 6059B, which explicitly asks if you are carrying more than $10,000 in cash or monetary instruments. Leaving the United States, I’ve only seen one or two warnings red-flagging this requirement.

However, one time several years ago, I was boarding a flight in Baltimore bound for Paris. On the jet way, several men in poorly fitting suits confronted me. They identified themselves as Treasury agents and asked me how much cash I was transporting. I told them I wasn’t sure but that it was less than $200. They insisted on rifling through my carry-on, presumably to search for undeclared cash, and going through my wallet. After a relatively brief interlude, they allowed me to board my flight.

To enforce the new rules to declare TPADs, the Department of Homeland Security is developing high-tech card readers to deploy at U.S. ports of entry. The readers will identify whether the cards in your wallet are credit cards, debit cards, or TPADs. Only the value stored on a TPAD need be declared, assuming the total value of monetary instruments carried across the U.S. border exceeds $10,000.

“[B]order declaration should not apply to codes, passwords and other intangibles…The structure of the currency and monetary instruments declaration regime, hinges on the existence of a physical object. The language requires something that can be passed from one individual to another in order to be presented to a third party for execution/payment.”

Bitcoin and similar digital currencies make FinCEN’s currency reporting rules, and their expansion to encompass TPADs, obsolete before they’re even finalized. But don’t think for a minute that technological innovation will prevent these rules from coming into effect. After all, Boobus Americanus must believe the government is doing something �" anything �" to fight the wars on drugs, terrorism, money laundering, immigration fraud, etc. Whether the initiative actually accomplishes anything is much less important than whether it appears to be accomplishing something. And it’s simply inconceivable to ask whether the wars are worth fighting at all, and if we should simply allow individuals to move their assets anywhere in the world, as they see fit, without government imposed restrictions.

 

Reprinted from Nestmann.Com

 

Mark Nestmann [send him mail] is a journalist with more than 20 years of investigative experience and is a charter member of The Sovereign Society’s Council of Experts. He has authored over a dozen books and many additional reports on wealth preservation, privacy and offshore investing. Mark serves as president of his own international consulting firm, The Nestmann Group, Ltd. The Nestmann Group provides international wealth preservation services for high-net worth individuals. Mark is an Associate Member of the American Bar Association (member of subcommittee on Foreign Activities of U.S. Taxpayers, Committee on Taxation) and member of the Society of Professional Journalists. In 2005, he was awarded a Masters of Laws (LL.M) degree in international tax law at the Vienna (Austria) University of Economics and Business Administration. Copyright © 2012 Mark Nestmann