Prosecutor: Advocating jury nullification ‘not protected by the First Amendment’ 
Freedom's Phoenix – "Uncovering the Secrets and Exposing the Lies"


Bitcoin Average: $8847.68 Gold: $1336.34 Change: $0 Silver: $17.15 Change: $(0.00)

Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute Bitcoin to
Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute Funding by
PayPal or Credit Card

Sign-up for FREE
Daily Newsletter

See Complete Menu

Special Editions
Translate Page
RSS Feeds

Declare Your

with Ernest Hancock

Front Page
Page Two

Freedom's Phoenix
Online Magazine

Freedom Forum
Letters to the Editor
Report The News




Search by Keyword

    Contents by Subject
    Radio/TV Shows
    Feature Articles
    Opinion Columns
    News Stories
    Newsletters List
    Reference Links
OpenBazaar Hosting by Agorist Hosting
Purse.IO Save on All Amazon Purchases


Sign up to receive the Freedom's Phoenix Headlines by Email.

Make a one-time or periodic contribution.
Use your credit card or PayPal account.

Join us on our
Social Networks

Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:


Prosecutor: Advocating jury nullification ‘not protected by the First Amendment’

Prosecutor: Advocating jury nullification ‘not protected by the First Amendment’

By: Powell Gammill

Advocating for a controversial legal tactic known as jury nullification can get U.S. citizens prosecuted for jury tampering, according to one Manhattan prosecutor who’s pursuing that very charge against a 79-year-old former chemistry professor.

Indicted last year, all Julian P. Heicklen says he was doing is handing out pamphlets from the Fully Informed Jury Association near a courthouse. He wasn’t targeting any specific jury or juror, 

Additional related items you might find interesting:
News Link  •  Bill of Rights
Does the ACLU Any Longer Defend Civil Liberty?
02-25-2018  •, Paul Craig Roberts 
News Link  •  Bill of Rights
Has The Israel Lobby Destroyed Americans' First Amendment Rights?
10-06-2017  •, Paul Craig Robert 
News Link  •  Bill of Rights
A baker refused to make a cake for a gay couple due to religious beliefs.
06-27-2017  •, David G. Savage 

Comments in Response

Comment by: (#)
   Entered on: 2011-12-04 20:07:08

Kim Dyer here.  Jury Nullification is usually a benefit to the accused-I was taught this at an ASU modern social problems class by Professor Pete Padilla, who was fired for being "controversial"- he was teaching us to open our eyes the the RICO/ideology and targeting.  He actually told me that he left this state 3 years ago because he got wind that AZ was fixing juries, he warned me a year before might happen what sparked my RICO suit.  He was RIGHT ON.  I was taught that this is the only way to protect ourselves from corruption and a prison industrial complex that profits from fabricating charges, particularly under McNaughton Rule (to remove a problem  person from society).  Never imagined that a prosecutor would be so bold- but then again, I've seen a lot to where, maybe it doesn't shock me so much.  That should warrant grounds for appeal.   Americans suffer from boiled frog syndrome.

Comment by: Ken Valentine (#3512)
   Entered on: 2011-12-02 23:04:46

 Jury nullification is something that has come down to us from the Magna Carta -- 796 years ago.

Even Noah Webster defined the jury as "Triers of law as well as fact."

Ever since Magna Cartsa, it has been both the right and duty of the jury to judge not only the facts of the case, and the moral intent of the accused, but it has been their primary and paramount duty to judge the justice of the law itself -- and to hold the accused not guilty if they think the law itself is unjust.

Comment by: stupidamerkin (#42197)
   Entered on: 2011-12-02 21:21:36

This Rebecca Mermelstein is just another corporate bar member who needs to get a reality check. Do these drones ever quit? 

This isn't jury nullification. It's called jury education that the criminals running the justus system do not want you to know. These drones are masters of double speak Orwellian language.

The power of the judge or prosecutor over the jury is in direct proportion to the jury’s ignorance.

Red Beckman

Comment by: Powell Gammill (#13871)
   Entered on: 2011-12-01 12:17:48

Comment by: Powell Gammill (#13871)
   Entered on: 2011-11-30 22:05:06

Prosecution Explains Jury Tampering Charge

      Attorney For Freedom  
  Magazine / Newspaper
   Magazine Subscription Info
   Online Magazine List
   Newspaper Subscription Info
   Newspaper Issue List
RSS Feeds
   Articles RSS Feed
   Opinions RSS Feed
   Media RSS Feed
   Newsletter RSS Feed
   Smartphone Feed
   Podcast Feed
Radio / TV
   Declare Your Independence
      with Ernest Hancock

   Search by Keyword
   Contents Listed by Subject
   Radio / TV Show Archives
   Newsletter Archives
   News Links
   Feature Articles
   Opinion Columns
   Reference Links

Letters to the Editor
   List of Letters
   Write a Letter

Join Us
   Subscribe to Magazine
   Membership Sign-Up
   Be a Writer
   Be a Reporter
   Link to Us

   Buy Stuff – Sell Stuff

   Store on
More News
   Page Two
   Current News
   Freedom Forum
   Intro to Advertising with Us
   Magazine Advertising Rates
   Radio Advertising Rates
   Website Advertising Rates
Funding Center
   Support or Promote a Project
About Freedom's Phoenix
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Terms of Use
   Privacy Policy
   Writers List

Tutorials – Using This Site
   List of Tutorials
Media Resources
   News References
   Blog References
   Government References
The domain and name of this website are servicemarks of Ernest Hancock.
Website is Copyright © 2018 by Ernest Hancock.  All rights reserved worldwide.
4886 W Port Au Prince Ln, Glendale, AZ 85306 USA.
Website Designed by

Phoenix, Arizona
Time to display page: 0.078 Seconds -- Dynamic Page

Page Views:

free web stats

Stats by StatCounter