Article Image

IPFS News Link • Misinformation

Misinformation

• Eric Peters Autos

It is one of those words meant to slam shut the door on information. The talking about stuff, so as to know – to find out – exactly what we are talking about. To establish whether it is true as opposed to us being told it is true – and we'd better just stop talking about it.

Other such words are "racist," "transphobic" and "homophobic." These words all mean the same thing, to the extent they have any meaning.

Shut up. I don't want to hear it.

And – worse – you are badly motivated for saying whatever you just said.

Not just shut up. Be ashamed.

For even thinking it.

And for that reason, precisely, we ought to be thinking – and saying – it.

Who gets to decide what "misinformation" is? Why not let information decide?

If – for instance – these "vaccines" are safe as advertised, then why not let the information make the case? Or rather: Why would it not make the case – assuming they are, indeed, safe?

How is it "misinformation" to reference the information collected by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)? It was never considered "misinformation" before all of a sudden.