Article Image

IPFS News Link • Privacy Rights

The Left's Three-Pronged Attack on Property, Family and Religion: Part 1&2

• Dr Sherri Tenpenny - The Tenpenny Report

The Left's Three-Pronged Attack on Property, Family and Religion: Part 1

Nearly 60 years ago in Chile, a group of conservative Catholics led by Fabio Vidigal Xavier da Silveira declared that the Christian Democratic party became a communist tool to socialize all of Latin America. Vidigal wrote a book about it which was banned by the government at the time (hint: it was the Christian Democratic Party.)

Sound familiar?

It's happening now in America and the biggest prize of all – creating a communist America – is at stake.

We must remember that socialism is a bridge between capitalism and communism. Both socialism and progressivism want to centralize all control of the individual. They also want to control all the land and industry. The control is gained by peaceful means, usually gradual, legislation over a period of time (such as in Obama's eight years in office.

The major difference between socialism and communism is in the method of takeover; while socialism is "mostly peaceful protests" (sorry, couldn't resist), communism uses violent confrontation to eliminate all dissension. Either way, the goal of both is a stateless, classless society with Big Brother government having monolithic control of society. Mussolini called it the totalitarian society: "Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State."

In 1963, communism's 45 goals were read into the Congressional Record. In 1958, in the height of the Red Scare in the US, The Naked Communist: Exposing Communism and Restoring Freedom was published and millions of copies were sold. The book outlines the graphic (and failed) story of the past, present and future of communism.

Below are just a few of the 45 gems:

• Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

• Get control of the schools and teachers' associations. Soften the curriculum.

• Infiltrate the press and gain control of key positions in radio, TV and movies.

• Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy."

• Eliminate prayer or any religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates separation of church and state.

• Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate and old-fashioned.

• Discredit the American founding fathers as selfish aristocrats [and racists].

• Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies.

• Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

• Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.

The Left's Three-Pronged Attack on Property, Family and Religion: Part 2

In Part 1, we touched on the 45 ideals of communism. America has been under assault for a while now. After all, turning America into a communist state is the crown jewel of the cabal's plan. Sadly, the US has achieved nearly all of the 45 "ideals".

Both socialism and progressivism want to centralize all control of the individual. The control is gained by peaceful means, usually gradual and oftentimes by legislation over an extended period of time (such as in Obama's eight years in office).

Many of these 45 ideals can be rolled up into three targets: property, family and religion. In Part 1, we covered the assault on property. Now, let's talk about the assault on the family and religion.

The Family

Did you know that in his Communist Manifesto of 1848, Karl Marx called for the abolition of the family? One could reasonable argue that the family is a civil society's most important institution, but Marx wanted none of it. Marx also believed that abolition of property would lead to abolition of family. After all, losing one's home "nest" would greatly accelerate the breakup of the family.

Marx's principles continue today with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement which, on the surface, purports to be fighting for justice for African Americans. If this is true, why is one of the 13 BLM Guiding Principles a "disruption" of the nuclear family?

And what better way to disrupt the family than to pollute the young minds of children, so much so that they turn against their parents? Marx wanted to make the "New Man" but the family was an obstacle to his creation. To make the New Man, reeducation was necessary. In fact, Marx's goal was to rescue education from the hands and influence of the ruling class.

He believed that the old (meaning traditional) family was narrow-minded and petty, and therefore incapable of providing the education needed for the New Man. In Russia in 1917, as soon as the Bolsheviks gained power, they started turning children against their parents. Soviet schools even convinced students it was their duty to snitch on their parents.

I asked a friend the other day: "Did you ever in a million years think you would see drag queen story time or some of these sexual books on the library shelf for elementary students?" While it might be shocking that this lovely lady below, called Little Miss Hot Mess, is reading Goodnight Moon to your kindergartner, again, this is nothing new. It's the same playbook used by communists 100 years ago. To completely obliterate the family, communists in 1919 began to instruct young children regarding sexual perversions. Instructors told children that their traditional family's views on sex (such as monogamy) were horribly outdated, and instead instructed children about free love.


thelibertyadvisor.com/declare