Article Image

IPFS News Link • Ukraine

US, Ukraine strike PAC-3 missile production deal -- with a catch

• https://asiatimes.com, by Stephen Bryen

During their bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara, US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reached a major agreement regarding Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) missile interceptors.

The PAC-3 is the premier hit-to-kill air defense missile used by the US and many of its allies. The weapon has played a major role in the Iran conflict.

The proposed arrangement for Ukraine has two parts: a political agreement to give Ukraine a license to manufacture PAC-3 interceptors; and a short-term supply of PAC-3 interceptors from US inventory, "to bridge the gap." Ukraine is confident it can manufacture PAC-3 missiles under license.

Today, the only production of PAC-3 missiles outside the US is in Japan, where Mitsubishi Heavy Industries produces them under license.

The designation "PAC-3 Interceptor" is important. The US is focusing on expanding production of the PAC-3 MSE interceptor missiles, which offer significantly greater range and other improvements over the PAC-3. While it needs clarification, it appears President Trump offered PAC-3 but not PAC-3 MSE to Ukraine.

The US and Ukraine will soon start "technical talks" where many of the major issues, still undecided, can be addressed.

The MSE variant represents a comprehensive redesign optimized to defeat more complex, faster tactical ballistic missiles and hypersonic threats. There are many changes to the MSE. One of them is to go from a single pulse to a dual pulse rocket motor. 

The MSE's motor can ignite its first pulse to clear the launcher and accelerate toward the target area, then coast before igniting a second pulse later in flight. This provides a critical burst of kinetic energy right during the terminal phase, allowing the missile to pull high-G maneuvers against actively evading or high-velocity incoming threats.

It is not clear if the MSE version can defeat Russia's hypersonic missiles such as the Kinzhal, Zircon or Oreshnik. The PAC-3 version would face problems against the Kinzhal and Zircon and probably not be able to stop the Oreshnik.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

Missile to missile is one thing. Lately Russia has developed several methods to block enemy radio and radar control. US missiles have to see where they are going to do the job. Russia is blocking this sight with their electronics. PAC-3 doesn't stand a chance. Its manufacturers, however, are making a bundle $$$ off Americans through taxes to support them to manufacture.



OccupyTheLand