In reality, last week's report from Temple University and Wisconsin HOPE Lab is typical of the baloney that spawns policy hysteria nowadays.
Temple University/HOPE researchers assert that 36% of four-year college students and 42% of community college students are "food insecure" — a vaporous term beloved by pro-welfare advocates.
This analysis is modeled on the Department of Agriculture's annual Food Security survey. USDA is emphatic that its survey does not measure hunger, but that neonsize warning sign was ignored by this study (titled "Still Hungry and Homeless in College").
Temple/HOPE respondents were asked questions such as whether they feared "food would run out before I got money to buy more," or "Did you ever eat less than you felt you should because there wasn't enough money for food?" Redefining hunger as abstaining from second servings makes for a push-button crisis.
The study asserts that 26% of students with a college meal plan are "food insecure." Did they oversleep and miss breakfast?
Half the respondents who received Pell grants ($26.6 billion for 7 million low-income students in 2016) were labeled "food insecure."
This study offers no clues on what happened to that largesse — or to the other $100 billion in federal assistance provided to college students in 2016. Apparently, no matter how many handouts government provides, students still cannot be expected or trusted to feed themselves.
Some findings should have triggered the "dumpster data" alarm. Temple/HOPE "found that homosexual students were at much greater risk of basic needs insecurity than heterosexual students, but that bisexual students were at the highest risk." More than 10% of the respondents from four-year colleges labeled themselves "bisexual," and half of bisexual students allegedly go hungry.
Are they too busy cavorting with both genders to eat, or what? If there were a national conspiracy to starve bisexuals, we would've heard about it before now.
College students are supposedly three times more likely to be "food insecure" than other Americans. But the survey response rate was less than 10%, and responders were self-selected and enticed by the chance to win $100 prizes for spending a few minutes filling out an online form.
Survey results were also skewed because females were far more likely to respond than males (70% vs. 27% of respondents, with 3% "non-binary"), and they are more "food insecure" than male students (37% vs. 28%). But female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cellphones, according to a 2014 study. Maybe turn off the phone and microwave some oatmeal?
In lieu of this statistical charade, far more solid data exist on college students' health and diets. Rather than being perpetually famished, 70% of college students gain weight during their undergrad years.
Posted from LewRockwell.Com