When you consider the complexity of the universe - focusing on the part we can readily examine, the earth - you see a vast combination of complex "things" that are impossible. We really have NO clue as to how these things could have come into being.
Jim Humble says it this way in his latest newsletter entitled "Vegetarianism Facts and Fallacies" found at http://www.mmsnews.org/all-newsletters/171-vegetarianism-facts-and-fallacies-04-22-2013.html.
----------
Evolution is about our planet, not just man. Now, let me point out an
important and interesting thing about this planet. You’ve heard of
it. We have a natural ecosystem throughout earth. Earth is one great big
system of plants, animals, people, weather, and a thousand other things. Do
you possibly think that things just grew together all at once? The answer
is NO. All these things evolved together but the evolution had to be an
intelligent evolution. All life here is dependent upon other life here.
Nothing exists unto itself. How could a happenstance evolution, for
example, create or evolve mother’s love, or romantic love, or even
compassion? This is not an argument for or against GOD. This is only to
point out some obviously natural things that exist.
In order to produce life, this planet had to
have a moon but the existence of a moon makes the possibility of chance
thousands of times less likely. The main thing I want to show is that this
planetary system had to be designed by someone. Man might have evolved, and
horses, and pigs and things, but making a whole planet evolve in such a way
that it is an ecosystem designed somehow to support the top species of
intelligent beings is rather far-fetched if there wasn’t some kind of
control from the beginning.
The natural tendency of things is to
deteriorate. People get old and die. Automobiles get old and fall apart.
Man’s brutality towards man has gotten worse and worse over the
centuries and now we kill more men than ever before. The natural tendency
is to deteriorate, not to evolve towards better things. Things wear out.
This is the natural order of all things. So there are two developing
tendencies. One is towards deterioration, and the other is towards an
upwards evolution. I’m sorry, but the upwards evolution necessary to
design a whole planet simply could not happen by happenstance. There simply
had to be some intelligence behind it. The odds against the happenstance of
such a system would be infinite, which would then mean that it would never
happen.
Again, this is not an argument for or against
the existence of GOD. As I see it, whenever a planet shows up in the
natural sequence of this universe, or at least this galaxy, with the proper
conditions, that there has been built into the fabric of space the
intelligent record to evolve the entire planet for intelligent life. This
information was created by the designers of this universe. The designers
were, hold on to your hat, Life, all life. Life is not activated chemicals
and minerals such as a live body. That is merely something that the
instructions of evolution evolved so that life would have a fast-moving
interesting body to occupy. Nothing lives unless it is occupied by life,
which is something that cannot be defined without difficulty. (See the book
Secrets of Enlightenment by Jim Humble) If life isn’t there
the organism dies (quits functioning) whatever it might be, a human body, a
butterfly, a tree, a rat or whatever.
The evolutionists give us some sort of a
tremendous number that is one chance in billions that human life would
evolve. But can you see the tremendous odds that an ecosystem planet with
thousands of plants, animals, insects, evolved where most things were
designed to help one another and the intelligent species survive and even
run the planet? That a whole system would happen is millions of times more
complex than just evolving a single race of humans and a bunch of animals.
So, true or not, this theory would indicate that without the intelligent
evolution instructions built into the fabric of space, this planet could
not happen. (Of course there are dozens of other possibilities but
let’s at least admit it had to be something other than happenstance.
So you don’t have to believe like me, but my belief is that
intelligent life created this universe and that is us.)
----------
The point is, even though Humble is not trying to suggest that there is a God, both he and the evolutionists are starting to see in the complexity of nature, things that match the dictionary description of God, or at least a great god.
Now, add to the above the idea of something outside this universe. Consider that there just might be something that shares nothing whatsoever with anything in this whole universe. Consider that there might be something that is so extremely different than this universe that even the word "different" has no meaning, because there is absolutely nothing in this whole universe that we can base it on.
To deny the probability of God, in the light of all the complexity of the universe, amounts to an effort to crawl back into something way less enlightened than the dark ages.
