You know when you spread Internet Rumors your credibility is damaged and everyone except you seems to realize that claim is BUNK it started back with the Gannon story. If it has such credibility show us the computer and bring out the source other then an internet e mail rumor.

Attacking Snopes didn't answer the question.

According to Snopes those links are bunk. 

This is an ad hominem  argument: Where instead of attacking the merits of the argument, because you can, you attack the person making the argument. [Which usually means there are no substantive factual response.]

For example: Adolph Hitler promoted interstate highways.  Therefor interstate highways are bad.

Snopes is certainly not infallible,  but that fact that the political beliefs of those who run it may not match yours is not evidence that their claims are inaccurate.

Now showing that they have a history of allowing their bias to color their "facts" would be a credible argument.  But so far the evidence points more towards someone else making unsupported statements while letting their biases distort the facts.

Jim I like Freedom Fighter radio I have found much useful information on the site but this article is just not one of them. This article was in fact something Hal Turner the FBI Informant used. Now if I made an error and I have surely done so in passing things I had not checked I would tell my readers and my contacts I had made an error or if I were not sure I would present opposing FACTS. As such here is a link to Truth Or Fiction readers can see for themselves the Hal Turner FBI connection. http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/h/homeland%20security%20logger.htm

Jim throwing dust in the air? This is absolutely UNPRECEDENTED.