I don't think the story of King Arthur is true. Initially scientists may conclude this castle or rotunda was for him but there is no evidence Arthur ever existed. The Arthur legend/myth was a way to mystify the rein of Britain's first monarch King Alfred I. It's very possible the castle or location in question was a meeting place Alfred or any one of Britain's kings used for the purposes stated in the article. nice try though.

I'm with Mike.

Why do you guys not believe in magic? Just because we have no proof this happened doesn't mean it didn't happen. You all have no proof I even exist as a human does that mean I'm not here? 

And what about magnets? Nobody really knows how they work yet we do not deny that they do.

 As I understand it, the Arthurian Legend originated  in France.

Ken, it could very well have originated with the Norman invaders, although it`s a bit unlikely. Still, a myth is a myth is a myth. I love this particular myth though. While unhistorical in the extreme, it`s pretty dang cool nonetheless.

`You all have no proof I even exist as a human does that mean I'm not here?`. Seepy, nobody has ever disagreed with you on this. Nobody would argue that you are entirely human. Certainly, we have never thought that you are `all here`.

But you are cute. And we have a soft spot for the adorable.

Oh, and magnets. Some people don`t know how they work. Others have completed grade 7.