Mr Wrights,

Do not fret - BinDeadALongTime died in 2001

The reason for the no-fotos etc is because this is, once again, a government hoax.

That was NOT BinLaden who was killed.

You are quite right that it was not Bin Laden.

Very correct and well written article. I have been a 911 truther since the day it happened. It took me about two minutes to realize that I was watching a false flag operation , and the "news" reports (propaganda) immediately after 911 reinforced my belief.  I have seen no concrete evidence that Bin Ladin was behind the attacks of 911. But I have seen voluminous concrete evidence that the Twin Towers and WTC 7 were packed with explosives and that their collapse was a controlled demolition. There is no longer a rule of law in this country.  That went out with George W. Bush and a congress that was too immoral to stop him. This nation has occupied and destroyed Iraq, a nation that had nothing to do with 911. It is doing the same in Afghanistan and Libya. These wars are about stealing oil. If you are rich enough you can lie, murder anyone who gets in your way, and steal whatever you want.  Anything goes.  And talk about a gullible public! They would believe anything, not even requesting facts. No, it is not the same and never will be again. 

See what I mean? Read my commentary below. The point I want to put across is that there's a lot of them whose sense of reality is not of this world ... i.e, A lot of them really believed that 911 and bin Laden were never connected at all! There were NO HIJACKED TERRORIST-MANNED AIRLINES THAT STRUCK THE TWIN TOWERS AND THE PENTAGON BUILDING!!! What was shown on television on that day of infamy was just Hollywood technology.

Ergo, with his scripted announcement that Osama bin Laden is dead, Obama, fried in his own lard, might bite the dust in the 2012 presidential race! Read what I said ...Comment by: bakadude (#27746)
   Entered on: 2011-05-04 09:43:50

The expectation is that Obama will win his 2012 re-election bid because he had declared Osama bin Laden dead – killed by operatives he formed as Commander-In-Chief to get the Public Enemy No. 1. Applause … applause!

But I disagree. On the contrary – in the heat of the 2012 election campaign -- Obama will be fried in his own lard. If Osama is dead, where’s the dead body? And from today up to the day of 2012 election there is still no dead body showing up, Obama will become the underdog.

Millions of supporters of Osama bin Laden in the U.S. [millions of the enemy within who hate America as "The Evil Empire"] will argue and bring hordes of friends to the polls who suspect that the killing if true was in fact "murder". And still millions of the in-between will counter-ask Obama if indeed it was "murder", where is the CORPUS DELICTI? They want to see the body of the crime … not just the body brought forth by excessive emission of saliva from the president’s mouth.

The prima facie showing of the Corpus Delicti is necessary to establish not just a visual but a moral certainty that bin Laden is dead. I expect Congressman Ron Paul of Texas who is also running for president to bring up and headline this issue. It has been earlier reported that Paul will be running for president again on the same platform he had before that 911 was not the fault of Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda terrorists but that of Americans who went to the Middle East and poked their nose on Muslims’ Islamic affairs.

Of course I expect this Libertarian paper-revolutionary favorite from Texas to lose again – and perhaps Paul will never win the presidency at all just to be frankly real -- because he wanted to be president of the United States of America without a central bank [he hates Bernanke and the Federal Reserves run by financial "pirates" and manned by "thieves"] or to be president of the greatest nation on the planet without an income tax; a stay-at-home policy in international relations; expel the U.N. headquarters in New York; abolish foreign aids and just be Americans and live like great Americans inside the country, never mind the other people of the world who only want our dollar; cut down military buildup and if possible declare war unconstitutional and many more that many emotional Libertarians indorse but I as a Libertarian of reason totally disagree, and unconditionally disapprove.

How much will this confuse Obama’s chance of winning the 2012 presidential derby is the subject of worried speculations. Paul can pull millions of his supporters – die-hards who believed him that those condemned Muslim terrorists should not be blamed for 911 – take his millions of followers out of the main candidates’ orbit, and if Al Qaeda retaliates for the reported killing of bin Laden [God forbids!], add to it the fact that Americans have never seen the reported "killing" and body of bin Laden, then Obama is done … his hope of winning although he is a favorite, could be torpedoed by what is called in Poker a "bad beat".