Everyone wonders, "Who will eventually replace Ron Paul?" - Meet Rep. Justin Amash of Mich
• www.thehill.comIn his effort to redefine conservative success in Congress, 31-year-old freshman Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) invites comparison with the House’s best-known libertarian — Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas).



If the GOP runs s0meone against him in his primary, and if he survives they turn around and endorse his Democrat opponent...then I might believe.
Powell, I'm not saying he is the second coming, or that he is a clone of Paul,...just that he seems very promising. If only more freshman Congressmen were like him.
why not Rand Paul? Jim Demitt? Adam Kokesh?
I think Charles Manson will be most likely it. Larken Rose is a strong candidate. The only problem is who would vote for them? One is in a can for life, the other is a convicted felon. Anyway, at least Ron Paul and these guys have one thing in common -- "UNELECTABLE". Darn it. I'm serious!
Of course, most of the good guys - especially the powerful ones - are virtually unelectable. Most of us have known that for a long time. IT'S THE REASON WHY THEY ARE UNELECTABLE THAT IS THE ISSUE. They are unelectable because the bad guys hold the keys to the "back doors" on the electronic voting machines.
We all like to say things like, "I told you so!" It makes us feel good when we are right. It makes us feel important. It might even make us some money when people come to us for advice in the future, since we are the ones who knew it ahead of time.
But the other side is, when we flaunt our, "I know what's gonna happen," and our "I told you so," a little too much, people start to wonder if there isn't some "insider activity" going on behind the scenes. Are the people who are so sure that Ron Paul and others are unelectable, are they working with the behind-the-scenes, back-door voting machine controllers?
To be sure, they will deny it. But any crook denies that he is a crook. So, the question is still there.
Yeah, Anonymous, that's why Paul and Amash are public office holders,...because they are sooooooooo unelectable. Feel like an ass? You should.
Why is there so much push and fuss about Ron Paul? People are now even wondering where he is. He has been a perennial candidate for president and as usual the announcement to quit has long been videotaped, to be released at a more melodramatic time. The scripted announcement to drop out from the race is about to be published. The right thing to do is ignore him and just wait for the time he falls out as usual. It is so much waste of time, energy and space saying this and that about Ron Paul who is about to exit from the twilight zone into a limbo where he has always been, until the next presidential election comes again and he announces his everlasting bid to run for president, and quit again. This repeats and repeats in so many years now! It is just a crazy, vicious cycle of wasting time, energy, space and resources which could have been used for other constructive purposes! He is as old as any of the gods of Greek Mythology that profiters who make a business out of him should now top using him. It is not fair to the man who is a victim of his own destiny.
The term "Unelectable" which has been discussed here for so long, refers to Ron Paul WHO COULD NEVER BE ELECTED as an everlasting candidate for President! It has never been referred to Ron Paul's election to office as a Congressman. This guy posting a comment on the term "unelectable" who calls himself a Chip on his shoulders doesn't even know what we are debating about. He just butted in like a headless chicken who doesn't know what he is saying or where he is going ... ay, Chihuahua ...Mama mia!
The usual excuse coming from the "lunatic fringe" is that Ron Paul never wins in his endless bid for the presidency because all voting machines used during elections are always malfunctioning! What a creep! This kind of National Institute of Health description of "mental illness" is beyond cure!