• Mondoreb
The New York Times–surprise!–only took 5 days to uncover “dirt” on Sarah Palin. Surprise #2!: the NYT took 10 months to look into the John Edwards scandal. Surprise! #3!–the Times lost another 30,000 subscribers. Are there really any surprises at the
And more important since I know who John Edwards is, why do you think whom he banged behind his wife's back is sooooo important that you devote many weekly stories to it? I get it when he is running for President and even when there was a chance he would yet again be a VP nominee. But now who cares?
Palin, on the other hand is globally relevant now, where she wasn't relevant a few days ago outside of Alaska.
1 Comments in Response to NY Times Dishes Palin Dirt; Loses 30,000 More Subscribers
And more important since I know who John Edwards is, why do you think whom he banged behind his wife's back is sooooo important that you devote many weekly stories to it? I get it when he is running for President and even when there was a chance he would yet again be a VP nominee. But now who cares?
Palin, on the other hand is globally relevant now, where she wasn't relevant a few days ago outside of Alaska.