Article Image

IPFS News Link • Homeland Security

Department of Homeland Security buying up enough ammo to wage seven-year war

• http://www.naturalnews.com, by Mike Adams
 
(NaturalNews) As we recently reported, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), an agency that says its main purpose now is to thwart "homegrown terrorism," has awarded a contract to ammunition manufacturer ATK for acquiring 450 million rounds of .40 caliber hollow point ammo. You can view the announcement of the ammunition purchase at this press release: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/atk-secures-40-caliber-ammunition-co...

Our initial coverage of the story is at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/035607_government_checkpoints_Martial_Law....

Many NaturalNews readers may not know this, but "hollow point" ammunition is never purchased for practice or training. This ammunition is purchased for the sole purpose of being used in active fighting. At the same time, it is a violation of the Geneva Convention to use hollow point ammunition on the battle field.

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by Anonymous75
Entered on:

You think your threat of violence is not taken seriously by the Government? I’ll be damned if you think otherwise.

Those who are so angry that they want to shoot cops dead are just one of those serious threats to the safety of Americans and to national security.

Sociopaths and violent psychopaths like Larken Rose, Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, Jared Loughner and their kind had been described by the recent study of the National Health Institute as a new bunch of anti-Government terrorists that tend to be violently homicidal because they are suffering a certain kind of "mental illness" that could not be cured. Their number is rapidly growing every day. You are with them in this website. You read them every day and you can feel the intensity of their hatred.

Judging from the nature of their anti-Government mental disorder [Larken Rose’s case is demonstrative of this illness], there is no way that the Department of Homeland Security can reason out with them to calm them down, to pacify their threat not only to rise against the Government but to kill and destroy. Only bullets can stop them.

The Government is prepared for any eventuality to protect the people. The kind of bullet the Government is using as you read this in this news report [that explodes in the body when it hits] illustrate how determined DHS is to stop those psychopathic terrorists right in their track when they attack like zombies. You have perhaps seen this in the movies.

I posted recently a comment on how to deal with dangerous sickos like Larken Rose. I want you to read it.

Comment by: Anonymous75 (#045815)

Entered on: 2012-04-25 10:39:51

My way is the ONLY way how to deal with threats to life and property coming from mentally-disturbed terrorists like Larken Rose and his likes, i.e. Timothy McVeigh, Unabomber, Jared Loughner and their kind. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY – THE ONLY CORRECT WAY, IS DEFINITELY MY WAY.

Look here, people … the American people agree with my way how to deal with Rose and his kind – eliminate them or else be eliminated! Extreme? Yes, because extreme situation only requires extreme solution. To save my life and that of my family – and yours too if you care – has NO compromise. You either live – which means terrorists don’t – or die – which means terrorists live and kill some more. That’s what I mean when my life and yours have no compromise in dealing with this kind of terrorists.

Notice carefully – and again I will attempt to make you understand: The American people agreed with my way. Through Congress they showed their agreement by passing the latest tool to us in dealing with terrorists like Larken Rose and his likes – the National Defense Authorization Act. This time the American people, tired of the tricky legal maneuvers of terrorists, acted through Congress and got rid of this bullshit called "due process" terrorists hide behind when caught doing their terrorist activities. More NDAA-like tools to use are coming. This nation can no longer take chances after 911 – we may not survive another 911 because this time it could be a biological kind of WMD, you name it.

Psychictaxi, our paths often crossed and we rarely agree with each other because I still have a record to show that you are as angry as Rose when you put your passion in writing down your feelings, right or wrong. You must have a record of mine too. Look at it. It will show you the CIVILITY of my way, the only way I take in the debate. I have learned this the hard way. My education and knowledge in this area are beyond the reach of any of you.

In this issue we are now discussing, your approach of civility in solving problems that to me looks like a hammer hitting Rose’s thick skull surprises me because it has always been my way. But as you know, my way is SITUATIONAL, which means it accepts exceptions.

Dealing with psychos like Larken Rose and his kind, is an exception. You want a "civil discourse" as your way in dealing with them. It won’t work. You don’t do that to sociopaths. It’s like banging your head against the wall and they won’t even see that you are bleeding, much more listen to you.

In short, you are dealing with wackos. The mind is abiotic of understanding anything other than the voice they hear in their head. That’s how sick they are. Forget your way. You sound funny when you say that this loco is "brilliant". Are you kidding me? He is a stalking shoot-and-kill-cops "dark" shadow. It’s all dark. From this Sicko, nothing shines at all.

That they are dangerous is an understatement. Those dangerous mentally-disturbed pain in the ass advocate a "systematic employment of violence and intimidation to coerce a [the] government…". This quoted statement exactly described Rose and his kind as terrorists that employ a system of violence and intimidation to coerce the U.S. Federal Government, i.e. shoot all cops dead or kill people in the government … "blow their brains out" and other statements of terror.

I use this definition of terrorists exactly describing them from "The new authority on the English Language" – The New [most modern] Shorter Oxford English Dictionary.

I have also a "legal" definition of terrorists culled from a case I once handled in my practice of law, but I will no longer drag you there … it is an unfamiliar territory for all of you – including Larken Rose and his kind, and to those who are making comments on this page.

I am always patient to reach all of you by using a layman’s language as much as I can – to make you people understand what we are dealing with in this debate that actually is all about terrorism – the more dangerous one because of "mental illness" involved that has no cure, which of course you just don’t know

Comment by brag
Entered on:

 R.I.P. to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers.



thelibertyadvisor.com/declare