I'm looking at how the Charlie Kirk case has spiralled into competing narratives, because between conflicting forensic claims, headlines shifting their language, and endless speculation, it stops being about what actually happened and turns into a kind of information overload where people are reacting to stimuli rather than facts.

I'm looking at how the Charlie Kirk case has spiralled into competing narratives, because between conflicting forensic claims, headlines shifting their language, and endless speculation, it stops being about what actually happened and turns into a kind of information overload where people are reacting to stimuli rather than facts.