IPFS
General Managers - KPHO TV5 Steven Hammel & Jerome Parra of KNAZ TV2 to jail?
Written by Ernest Hancock Subject: Politics: Libertarian CampaignsFrom: "David T. Hardy" To: steven.hammel@kpho.com
CC: sheriffmack@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:10:57 -0500
Hello! I represent Sheriff Mack and Ariz. Libertarian Party, and wish to
pass on the following information. I've resarched the McCain-Feingold
Campaign Reform Act and its accompanying FEC regulations.
McCain-Feingold generally forbids a corporation to fund or broadcast
"electioneering" communications -- anything that mentions or clearly
identifies a candidate within 60 days of a general federal election.
11 Code of Fed. Regulations sec. 100.13(2) exempts broadcasters which stage
a candidate debate, under certain conditions. 100.13(2)(c) specifically
lays out the conditions for candidate selection:
" (c) Criteria for candidate selection. For all debates, staging
organization(s) must use pre-established objective criteria to determine
which candidates may participate in a debate. For general election debates,
staging organizations(s) shall not use nomination by a particular political
party as the sole objective criterion to determine whether to include a
candidate in a debate." [Section then goes on to prescribe rules for
covering primary elections].
This requires that the criteria both be "pre-established" and "objective."
A broadcaster cannot simply make an ad-hoc judgment that a third party
doesn't have enough support. Rather they must, at some point before making
selections, establish an objective policy of just how much support is
required and how it will be demonstrated. From what the sheriff indicates
to me, KPHO had no such established policy. Rather, its decisions are
motivated by the dictates of the two major candidates, and based upon an ad
hoc call that the sheriff lacks enough support (without any previous policy
as to just how much support is required).
It appears that the exclusion of the sheriff from the debate would violate
McCain-Feingold and the FEC regulations. As I recall, a violation is a
criminal offense, as well as subject to civil penalties imposed by the FEC.
The full text of the regulations, downloaded from the FEC.gov website,
follows:
Sec. 110.13 Candidate debates.
(a) Staging organizations. (1) Nonprofit organizations described in
26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(3) or (c)(4) and which do not endorse, support, or
oppose political candidates or political parties may stage candidate
debates in accordance with this section and 11 CFR 114.4(f).
(2) Broadcasters (including a cable television operator, programmer
or producer), bona fide newspapers, magazines and other periodical
publications may stage candidate debates in accordance with this section
and 11 CFR 114.4(f), provided that they are not owned or controlled by a
political party, political committee or candidate. In addition,
broadcasters (including a cable television operator, programmer or
producer), bona fide newspapers, magazines and other periodical
publications, acting as press entities, may also cover or carry
candidate debates in accordance with 11 CFR part 100, subparts B and C
and part 100, subparts D and E.
(b) Debate structure. The structure of debates staged in accordance
with this section and 11 CFR 114.4(f) is left to the discretion of the
staging organizations(s), provided that:
(1) Such debates include at least two candidates; and
(2) The staging organization(s) does not structure the debates to
promote or advance one candidate over another.
(c) Criteria for candidate selection. For all debates, staging
organization(s) must use pre-established objective criteria to determine
which candidates may participate in a debate. For general election
debates, staging organizations(s) shall not use nomination by a
particular political party as the sole objective criterion to determine
whether to include a candidate in a debate. For debates held prior to a
primary election, caucus or convention, staging organizations may
restrict candidate participation to candidates seeking the nomination of
one party, and need not stage a debate for candidates seeking the
nomination of any other political party or independent candidates.





1 Comments in Response to General Managers - KPHO TV5 Steven Hammel & Jerome Parra of KNAZ TV2 to jail?
Outstanding piece of legal research. You are so correct to challenge this injustice. Mr. Mack has a valuable message which deserves to be heard especially since he is a legitimate candidate despite Jon Kyl's maringalizing inuendos about Richard and the Libertarians. Thank you for having the courage to speak the truth!
Dave Hodges
State Party Chair
Constitution Party of Arizona