Article Image

What traitor, with nothing but manufactured 'evidence' she'd paid for, called the Presid

Written by Vin Suprynowicz Subject: Clinton News


Now that the most ruthless, despicable, roust-them-out-of-bed-in-the-middle-of-the-night, threaten-to-indict-their-wives-and-kids prosecutors that the scum at the DOJ and FBI could come up with have thrown up their hands and admitted it was all a scam, let's not forget who launched the "Trump is a Russian agent" hoax:

Journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes detail in their Clinton campaign book "Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign" how Clinton blamed her election loss not on her own fantastic arrogance and scorn for the American peasant class but on the (rigged to clear her) FBI investigation into her private e-mail server and deletion of emails under subpoena, along with . . . wait for it . . . "Russian interference."

"She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way," a longtime Clinton confidant told Allen and Parnes. The pair detailed how Hillary Clinton's Russia-blame-game was spurred by her senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook (what a curious pair. Are either of those guys NORMAL?), less than 24 hours after she conceded to Trump.

"That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn't entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument."

(see: )

How could the Russians have done that? Did they have deep undercover "mole" agents in place in each of America's 3,071 counties and parishes, with the expertise to rig tens of thousands of voting machines?

No. Of course not. Instead, we're supposed to believe it was all done by a few Internet trolls in Leningrad, sending out a few thousand late-night emails of the "Hi, I contact you in confidence from a Nigerian bank . . ." variety.

Why did the press buy such transparent crap? Isolated in their Little Blue Islands of Anti-American Political Correctness in New York, Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Berkeley, they were so heavily invested in the "inevitability" of the Hillary presidency ("after all, it's HER TURN!") that they simply couldn't imagine how she lost – especially to a blue-collar billionaire (how gauche!) and Reality TV loudmouth whom she had virtually HAND-PICKED as her chosen opponent.

Heck, they had the "Access Hollywood" tape all cued up and ready to go. Americans would hear Trump (unaware he was being recorded) say something about how, if you were a star, some women would even "let you grab their pussies." Plus, she had a half-a-dozen graying bull-dykes ready to come forward as a follow-up, reporting – not under oath, you understand, no police reports, no court filings, no sworn affidavits, no corroboration, no evidence – that they thought maybe Trump had once "touched them" or "bumped them" . . . like, you know, 15 or 20 years ago.


Did Hillary Clinton find that kind of language and behavior shocking? Oh, dear, I hope when you read that you didn't just exhale some of your favorite beverage through your nose. This woman is a serious drunk who has been known to swear like a sailor at the top of her lungs while throwing heavy objects at her serial rape-and-molest husband – who finally got into a little trouble for diddling one of the college-age White House interns (who believed he'd marry her) with a cigar. But she thought the rubes out in TV-LAND would find it shocking.

See the problem? The whole strategy was based on the assumption that the voters out there in Flyover Country are really, really stupid.

Surely no voter would be thoughtful enough to say, "You know, it's a little rough, a little unfortunate, but I wouldn't want to see my father or brother or husband or son condemned — have his career or his chance at public office ruined – because someone secretly recorded him saying the word 'pussy.' Is that really all she's got?"

The press couldn't believe she could lose, so they were ripe for a conspiracy theory, a pre-packaged explanation that the election was stolen away from the forces of Righteous Collectivism by gray aliens from the Planet Munimula. No, wait, I mean by Argentine gauchos throwing those bolo things.. No, no, that's not it. I mean by . . . Russian hackers. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Only here's the thing: It was Hillary's DEFEAT that was almost inevitable, given an opponent who would work hard, advance an agenda that could actually improve things for the American working man, and most of all stand tall, refuse to grovel and cry and apologize the first time he was accused of doing or saying something "Politically Incorrect."

We don't even have to resort to "20/20 hindsight." How else could I have predicted a Trump win in October, 2016? Here are the five things anyone could have — and should have — seen.

1) Hillary Clinton has never been popular.

Other than her body servant, the Muslim Brotherhood agent Huma "Mrs. Anthony Weiner" Abedin, who are her FRIENDS? Anyone who's met more than handful of politicians can tell you that a lot of them have a certain quality. From your local County Commission to the U.S. Senate, many of these guys (and a few gals) are just the life of the party. It's a gift. They seem to fill up the room. People gravitate to them. You can disagree with one of these characters on a whole bunch of issues, but when you're in their presence it doesn't matter; you still know if they'll come to your back-yard beer-and-burger party they'll make it a success, everyone will talk about how HE was there.

But Hillary doesn't go to evening barbecues. She's drunk.

Where is Hillary Clinton FROM, anyway? Didn't she grow up in Illinois, go to school in New England, and then become First Lady of Arkansas? Yet when she ran for the Senate did she go home to make use of her "support group" of "friends of many years" in either Illinois or Arkansas? No, she went to New York, where no one really KNEW her.

When Bill was elected attorney general in Little Rock, his friends used to plead with people to invite Hillary out. "The poor thing, no one LIKES her." Why? She was a prissy, nose-in-the-air northern "Yale intellectual" who was better than any of those yokels of Dogpatch. (Except for Webb Hubbell and Vince Foster, of course, both of whom, eventually became . . . inconvenient.)

She certainly wasn't going to put on some demure Southern Belle outfit and bake cookies and serve barbecued finger foods at a tailgate party at some kind of FOOTBALL game where you cheer for a team that's named for some kind of PIG.

Tammy Wynette and Loretta Lynn? The pathetic music of barefoot hayseed losers. She actually said so, in the "60 Minutes" interview that would define her forever: "I'm not sitting here some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette." Though in fact that's exactly what she was doing — standing by her meal ticket.

Following the revelations that he'd been forcing state employees to give him blowjobs and keeping Gennifer Flowers as a mistress for, like, forever, it was ONLY HER WILLINGNESS to "stand by her (fantastically unfaithful) man" — as the two of them sang their little duet, denying that their marriage was merely "some arrangement" of mutual political convenience — WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT IT WAS — that saved his political career . . . AND HERS.

See , . . . or ; . . . or

And isn't that the final contradiction of Everything Hillary? She wants to be the feminist heroine who proved a woman can "do it all on her own" . . . by permanently hitching her wagon, permanently debasing herself to this charming oaf, this pig who ruts in everyone else's cornfield. And every time she tries to take the reins and ignores him, as he warns "What about the blue-collar workers in places like Wisconsin?" . . . she proves her own political instincts SUCK; she loses first in 2008 to some slick-talking Chicago fraud, and then, on her last shot, to some BUFFOON OF A CONSTRUCTION WORKER!


2) Hillary is a crook, and a greedy one.

Sure, most people in politics manage to accrue a nice bank balance, these days. People want to do them favors -– in hopes of a favor in turn, down the road -– and offer anything from stock (cattle futures?) tips to silent partnerships in lucrative land deals. But not many people have whole BOOKS written about how greedy and corrupt they are (hubby accepting a half-million-dollar "speaking" fee from a Russian bank while the wife was deciding whether to OK a deal that would turn over 20 percent of our uranium to, um . . . THE RUSSIANS), including how she took millions from FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS while selling us out . . . pardon me, while "serving" as SECRETARY OF STATE.

See: , which cites the following from

"Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich" :

CONFIRMED: Hillary's Foundation Hid a $2.35 Million Foreign Donation from the Head of the Russian Govt's Uranium Company that Had Business Before Hillary Clinton's State Dept. — a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration.

CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Bagged $500,000 for a Speech in Moscow Paid for by a Kremlin-linked Bank.

CONFIRMED: Hillary's Foundation Hid a Foreign Donation of 2 Million Shares of Stock by a Mining Executive with Business Before Hillary's State Dept. — a Clear Violation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Obama Administration

CONFIRMED: Hillary's Approval of the Russian Takeover of Uranium One Transferred 20 percent of All U.S. Uranium to the Russian Govt.

CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton was Paid by a For-Profit Education Company Laureate While the Company Benefitted from an Increase in Funding from Hillary's State Dept.

CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Delivered Numerous Speeches Paid for By Individuals and Corporations with Pending Business Before Hillary's State Dept.

CONFIRMED: Bill Clinton Lied about Hosting a Meeting with Frank Giustra and Kazakh Nuclear Officials at Clinton's Home in Chappaqua, New York.

3) Hillary Clinton would likely have died (or become dangerously mentally unstable) on the job. To say she was a "weak" candidate has at least a double meaning.

How comatose was she, the night they waited in vain for her to OK a rescue mission for our guys in Benghazi? (The planes were on the runway, ready to go.) She thought we missed her being picked up and thrown bodily into her "Scooby van" when she froze up because her morning dose of Leva-Dopa had worn off at the memorial Sept. 11 services in New York in the fall of 2016?

Then, when she left her daughter's apartment to walk around, smile, wave at and reassure the public a few hours later, she gave the lie to her own doctor's story that she had "pneumonia." People don't recover from "pneumonia" to full, ebullient health in an hour or two. But Parkinson's patients who get a fresh dose of L-Dopa do.

4) Trump worked his ass off. He held 137 rallies (two a day, every day) between Sept. 1 and Nov. 7. Hillary? 67.

Attendance? The now thoroughly discredited "Mainstream Media" worked so hard to scoff at Trump's crowds -– going so far as to publicize photos of mostly halls taken hours before his crowds were admitted, while tightly framing photos of a hundred high-school girls at a pathetic Hillary "rally" in a college gym in Philadelphia to hide the echoing emptiness around them -– that the Left probably fell into an old trap of "believing their own propaganda."

They were so busy scoffing at Trump's crowds of (to their minds) toothless hayseeds that they never bothered to ask what Trump's unprecedented crowds — especially in crucial battleground states like Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania — MEANT.

In fact, he blew her out of the water by a factor of 10, drawing 700,000 ecstatic, cheering Americans between Sept. 1 and Nov. 7 to her estimated 60,000. (And between the two numbers, it's the 60,000 I'd question. Does that include the 10,000 who actually showed up to see Beyonce and Jay-Z in Cleveland Nov 5 -– standing up and showing Hillary their asses as they headed for the exits when it was her turn to speak? How many of those 10,000 do you suppose actually voted for ANYONE?)

Why did this man with "no path to 270" ( ) draw those kinds of crowds? Because he was articulating an agenda designed to help the American working man:


5) Trade reform that would get rid of the advantage Wall Street had found in closing U.S. factories and moving those jobs and machine tools overseas -– instead bringing the factories and the well-paying jobs back home.

Ending the War on Coal and the War on Oil, slashing excessive and economically crippling "green" regulations to turn America back into an energy self-sufficient -– heck, a coal and oil-exporting -– nation. Cutting taxes. Sealing the porous southern border and deporting millions of illegal aliens who consume tax-funded services while driving down wages -– including sneering Muslim terrorists like "Rashida Tlaib."

Trump promised jobs, security, prosperity, and an unapologetic new wave of American patriotism and greatness.

The answer from Miss Hillary and the Leftist media? They scoffed. They ridiculed. Couldn't be done. "Those jobs of the past are just not comin' back. . . . What magic wand do you have?" asked the smug and fatuous economic moron, Barack Huseein Obama. ( .)

They were wrong.

And what, in turn, was Miss Hillary's platform? Um . . . "Stay the Course," or "Stay Ahead Together" or "Keep Your Heads Together" . . . or something. Damned if I could figure it out. Basically, keep raising taxes, keep marching towards total government-run Collectivism (thanks, Comrade Stalin!), keep shutting down coal mines, oil fields, pipelines, steel mills, factories. But don't worry: All those displaced workers can now put on wigs and dresses and take part in "Drag Queen Story Hour" down at the library . . . or else be "retrained" to work as bus boys at IHOP.

One of her most prominent TV ads showed people walking down a street holding luminaria -– little candles in paper bags. "Let's keep what we've gained," was the message (or was it "Let's not go back"?) implying Fascist Trump was going to put black folk back in chains and ban Civil Rights marches, or . . . something. Damned if I know what it meant. But it certainly wasn't a rallying cry to seal our borders, throw out the illegal aliens, enforce our laws, bring back jobs and pride in America and its families. (Look how the leftists and their captive media have RIDICULED the patriotism of Trump and his supporters, ever since.)

In fact, Miss Hillary -– who probably never spent five minutes thinking about "trade," since she assumed Mr. Donohue and his globalist boys at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce would continue "taking care of" all that, as they've been doing for decades -– declared NAFTA and the "Trans Pacific Partnership" (which would continue to suck more than $500 billion a year out of the United States economy) were "just Grrrreat!"

(How perceptive of you, Miss Hillary.)

The Democrats -– from the 1920s through the 1960s the "party of the American working man" -– had nothing to say to America's workers, whatsoever. If you didn't go to an Ivy League school and you lived somewhere between Philadelphia and Sacramento you were some kind of "Deplorable Global-Warming deny-er," and you could just go fuck yourself.

Or possibly, as it turned out . . . . just go vote for Donald Trump.

"Trump beat Clinton among white voters without a college education by an astonishing 39 percentage points -– a margin larger than Ronald Reagan's against Walter Mondale in his 1984 landslide," wrote Ronald Brownstein in The Atlantic. "Trump not only beat her by nearly 50 points among blue-collar white men, but by almost 30 points among non-college-educated white women. (Trump is president largely because white working-class women gave him double-digit margins in key states -– a development that may occupy gender studies scholars for years,)" adds Mr. Brownstein, who apparently can't imagine a world in which parents stop spending $100,000 to send their kids off to useless "universities" to be awarded worthless degrees in "gender studies."

Similarly, Trump captured more than three-fifths of rural voters nationwide, including in the decisive Rustbelt states –Pennsylvania, Michigan, and . . . Wisconsin.

No Russian convinced Hillary not to go to Wisconsin

Donald Trump won because he was the best, straightest-talking presidential candidate at least since Ronald Reagan . . . if not since Andrew Jackson.

Hillary lost because she sucked, and because the American people, in their wisdom, knew it.

And by the way, Donald Trump running against the party of Open Borders, Sanctuary Cities, millions of new criminal illegal aliens, massive intentional vote fraud, legalized pedophilia and infanticide, and a speeded-up march down to the hell of Globalist Socialism? Providing they don't kill him — and they'll probably try — look for a 41-state sweep: Trump 380 to about 158 for any bumbling Democrat whore (and I use the term advisedly: if you were paid off with your first $80,000-a-year part-time government jobs for spreading your legs for a married man . . .)

. . . assuming they can hold all three states of California, New York and Illinois, that is. And THAT will be interesting to see. Do I hear a proposal to ban cars, trucks, aircraft, and cow farts, anyone?

Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: