When did they take off the "Ron Paul" signs?.I don`t see any on either car.

It is reported that Mr. Stuart ditched the signs at his house (this comes from the prosecutor at his second bail hearing who was making the case Stuart was trying to change the appearance of his vehicle to run) or a news report that claims he pulled over and ditched them down the road (since he was followed by witnesses at the scene I doubt this account).

I got a call this morning saying there was a plan in the works to have John killed in jail by the Mexican Mafia. Today. The source seems to have some veracity to it and I'd like to get the word out to keep watch, and if possible, for concerned individuals to make phone calls on his behalf to have him put into some kind of 'protective custody'.

A very well written article, though obviously slanted. I think this is probably the most complete composition written to date, with some very critical facts, theories and alternate possiblities obmitted; either by choice or by lack of investigation.

Phychictaxi, The Mexican mafia comment is comical at best. If you are getting reports of a possible plots, either Mr. Stuart is running with the wrong crowd or you're running with wrong crowd. Might be time for a little life audit me thinks.

Oh look! They just put John in Protective Cutody! What a suprise!

Nice article but you left out some FACTS
14 of 15 witnesses said Tom never touched Stuart.
14 of 15 witnesses said Stuart pointed the gun at Tom.
14 of 15 witnesses said Tom had his hands raised and was backing away from Stuart's car.
14 of 15 witnesses said Stuart shot Tom unprovoked.
The hood of Tom's car had (and still has) blood splatters and smears on the hood. Tom had backed quite a distance away when he was shot and fell on his own car.
When Stuart was examined at his arrest, there were NO blood spatters on him or on/in his car.
When Stuart was examined at his arrest, there was no eveidence of any assualt on him. There are photos taken immediately after his arrest.

Maybe you should go back to the story above and LOOK AT THE PICTURES! I see no blood and smears on his car - do you!?!

Excellent point, one photo from a slanted story versus actual court admitted evidence. Interesting how the 14 witnesses were completely ignored as well and the only witness who contradicted the other 14 is Mr. Stuarts wife. I'm sure you think the other 14 people must have conspired though. If you show up to the hearings you might learn the real facts of the case. Just a tip but that might also put a damper on your conpsiracy theories.

You have no clue what you are talking about. Go back to AZpeacemakers. The stories you've heard are wrong. There is plenty of blood on Johns car. The entry wound shows evidence that it happened at point blank range. Only one witness says Beasley was retreating and that witness did not have a good line of sight to the incedent. The witnesses who could see what really happened are all in agreement that Beasley was attacking, choking, and trying to drag John out of the car. John was not blocking Beasley. He was trying to make a u turn around him but could not due to traffic crossing in front of him. Ms. Beasley was so drunk the officers had to help her into and out of the police car to identify John. Officer Dalton lied to the grand jury and lied to the judge. He tried to get the witness with the best view of the incedent(except for Ms. Cantrell) to change her story three times when he was questioning her. She stuck to her story dispite detective Daltons badgering. The truth is out there. It is in the police reports but it is not what the media or detective Dalton have told you.
Beasley was a drunken maniac who attacked a man in his car and died due to his own bad choices.

For the second case, the documents are not "false". The judge has had many opportunities to show them to be false or fraudulent but has not/can not. Charbel cherry picked an administrative error to put John back in jail.

Astounding that all these people in power are willing to ruin their careers over a drunk. You must be right then. Apparently you haven't seen the rants that have been filed that landed Mr. Stuart back in jail. He sure picked a hell of a time to rant about the government, claim he has no SSN and say he was being held hostage. In the real world a crime was committed and you get charged with the crime and you go to court. Mr. Stuart seems to think real laws don't apply to him and that John Stuart isn't even his real name nor should he have to pay taxes. Convenient how certain facts were completely ignored when writing this story. 14 of 15 witnesses. Not a made up number. Not mentioned once in this story.

I would be happy to read your alternate explanations of evidence on the record. I am trying to get copies of police reports to post on this site so people can read for themselves.

As for Mr. Stomp. You are in error as are the vast majority on your site. Admitiedly my sources are the mainstream media which is not very satisfying. However, I can also see a few bits of evidence (what the intersection looks like, where Mr. Beasley's car was parked to see that Mr. Beasey had to have been right next to Mr. Stuarts vehicle,. Tere physically was no other room for him to be far back from the vehicle when he was shot. As to whether he was in the vehicle or pulling back with his hands up the account by Detective Dalton on the stand at the second bail hearing. There were multiple witnesses to te fact that Mr. Beasley was within the car attacking Mr. Stuart versus one witness claiming he had pulled back with his arms up. See:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0306stuart0306.html#

To qute: "Phoenix Police Detective Paul Dalton repeated statements from several witnesses that Beasley angrily stuck his hands inside the driver's side window of Stuart's SUV, grabbed him by the neck and possibly even tried to pull him out of the window before he was shot in the forehead. One witness, however, said that Beasley was backing away from the car when he was shot."...."While driving along Pinnacle Peak Road, they passed the car driven by Beasley, who was returning home with his wife from having drinks at a local bar after spending the afternoon at the Phoenix Open."

I understand you have lost a friend or an online friend, but spouting a list of patent untruths not even backed up by facts reported on AZPeachmakers (AZP) just destroys any credibility you have, and makes me figure you are blind to the facts.

Even I have questions, but you seem to have everything figured out despite the fact that the facts do not support your claims. Out of the many hundreds of blog comments on the AZP site only two were responsible enough to describe eyewitness testimony.

One was HobbitFromPA on Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:39 pm Who posted a list of what they heard at I believe the second bail hearing. I will add it to my already rather lengthy article tonight, as well as one from azhootie on Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:56 pm and he referred to TerriB who posted two rather nice bits. But understand when Google first hit your site I was pumped figuring there was good information there. There wasn't. Just a bunch of unsupported claims like the crap you just spouted. No references back to where these claims came from. Where they came from is someone saying it and everyone else regurgitating it ad nauseaum. Saying it many times does not make it so. And I suspect over time you will have to sink off and sulk somewhere. I would however LOVE to have references to everything you claim. As I said, I am hoping to get the Phoenix PD reports and post them. That should clear up a lot of things and the chips will fall where they may.

14 of 15 is a made up number. It was made up by Dalton. It is not true. Dalton LIED. How do I know???????

Because I have all 257pages of the police reports right here in front of me. The closest witness to the whole thing was in the car behind John. He states that Beasley was right at John's window when he was shot. According to this witness Beasley did not back up. He was shot at John's window. Several police reports discuss the blood on John's hood and windshield. The autopsy describes the characteristics of the entry wound which are consistent with a shot at very close range. The witness statements are quite clear about what happened and they do NOT match detective Dalton's statements.

So now Cindy (Johns lady friend) is really trying to sell that this somehow has to do with Ron Paul signs? What?!? How strange. Do you even know the Beasly's party affiliation? What if they are Paul supporters too lol. Someone let Cindy know how silly it is to keep bringing up Ron Pauls name. This is a tragedy on both sides already, no reason to bring politics into it. She should also tell John to stop with the false court filings claiming he has no SSN and that he's being abused inside. I realize it's all to help with some sort of insanity defense but at the end of the day, he really does have a SSN, he really does have a name, he really did break the law. There is no government conspiracy to get a Ron Paul supporter omg that's funny.