Freedom Forum

Welcome to the Freedom Forum of Freedom's Phoenix!

Freedom reigns here like the days of the old Wild West! We have no corporate or government censors to tell you what you can and cannot say in our public forums. We encourage everyone to keep a civil tongue, but you are free to express your opinions no matter what your perspective is on any subject -- just be prepared for someone else to have an entirely opposite view and tell the world you don't know what you are talking about!

Some entries, which our regular editors consider too vulgar -- according to their standards, may be tagged "Crude or Lewd" so the faint-of-mind folks don't have to view them, but everyone can use the link on the right-hand column to decide for themselves whether to show those entries or not.

Anyone may read the discussions shown in our forum. You will need to sign-up as a member and provide your name and valid email address to be able to add comments and participate in the discussions. There is no cost to join.

Now, join the party and have some real fun!


LIST OF DISCUSSIONS AND COMMENTS



Date Entered
Headline or Topic of Discussion / Comments
1 COMMENT
2021-04-03 12:03
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Accepting the ideas that the UN proposes, on a separate idea basis might be okay. But if their acceptance includes the UN on UN basis, it is unconstitutional.
1 COMMENT
2021-04-03 12:00
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
So, since Evers violated the law, and even fought the will of the legislature, and even fought the will of the people, what's he going to get as punishment? Is he going to get a simple reprimand?, slap on the hand?, a big (little) fine?, imprisonment? What? --- If the people don't force some worthwhile punishment, what good is a court ruling? If he isn't made to hurt, he'll do it all over again. Punish him so that he knows better next time. --- In Arizona, Ducey is being recalled. And he cancelled his usurpation, somewhat. Should he be punished, as well?
1 COMMENT
2021-04-01 07:21
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Americans against gun control points to the 1st and 4th Amendments. The 4th gives and/or protects our rights to private property. The 1st gives and protects our rights to travel. If we couldn't travel with our property, we'd have to travel naked. And that is exactly why we have the right to travel with out property. "They" want to call them guns, and among themselves they can. But we call them property, because they belong to us, so we can call them what we want, and we don't have to call them by "their" names. But if there is any doubt, the 9th Amendment says that we have other rights besides those given us in the Constitution. Which other rights? Any rights we want, as long as we harm nobody, don't directly threaten him, and don't damage his property. If we are called out by government, all we have to do is state that we are exercising our 'whatever' rights. If they go against their Oath of Office, sue them and make them pay.
1 COMMENT
2021-04-01 07:21
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
As if "law" has anything to do with order.
1 COMMENT
2021-04-01 07:10
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
The real reason is, they are building themselves a platform to rally against being called bald, when they are really white feathered on top.
1 COMMENT
2021-04-01 07:07
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
It's gonna take them til 2028 to get up to the speed of 750 mph ???
1 COMMENT
2021-04-01 07:04
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
The important thing about this is, they developed this gene machine by following and using machines of nature. --- All machines have makers. All of mans' machines are made by copying the machines of nature one way or another. All of mans' machines are made out of machines already found in nature. Machines have makers. --- Who was the really intelligent and capable Guy Who made all the machines of nature and the universe? After all, machines have makers.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-31 06:05
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
A Facebook BAN doesn't mean what you think it means. I signed up on Facebook one time, just to see some content that they wouldn't reveal without a sign-up. Afterward, I cancelled my account. They accepted that my account was cancelled, but they told me that anytime I wanted it back, all I had to do was login. Is THAT really cancelling an account? --- Once they have you recorded, they have you forever. They will never get rid of any information you divulged to them, including your IP address. They dump all info into super-computers that statistically analyze everything, and never forget anything.
4 COMMENTS
2021-03-30 18:08
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
In addition, regarding the below comments, when it is adjudicated that travel is a right under the First Amendment (as it already has been, so re-adjudicated), this will mean that nobody will need licenses or car plates any longer. People could make up their own "Right to Travel" cards to show officers who a little behind on the law.
4 COMMENTS
2021-03-30 17:57
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
By the way, "no-vaccine Passports would be required for all people in airline and public transportation companies.
4 COMMENTS
2021-03-30 17:48
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
If anybody who was vaccinated doesn't like the terms of the below comment, they can sue the State requiring "No-vaccine Passports" on the right to travel which is backed by the First Amendment. When the State loses (voluntarily, sort of), there will be president made that allows people to disregard vaccine passports in States that require them.
4 COMMENTS
2021-03-30 17:43
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Time for South Dakota, Florida and other States, to make a no-vaccine passport mandatory. Anybody entering the State must sign an affidavit that he has not been vaccinated, but if he has been, no entry into the State. A "No-vaccine Passport" will be issued to him, and withdrawn if it is later found that he was lying - with prosecution possible. Those vaccinated people who reside in the State, may not go out in public. After all, the vaccine is rapidly turning people into super-spreaders, and slowly into zombies. ;)
1 COMMENT
2021-03-30 15:16
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
She knows that when the people go too far with their freedom, the Biden regime puppet masters will send in countless numbers of BLM and Antifa rioters. Then the people will be forced to use their guns and ammo they have been stocking up on, and the whole Biden regime will come tumbling down. The CDC will go with it, and she will be out of a job, (sniffle).
1 COMMENT
2021-03-27 16:10
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Doesn't anybody have any sympathy for Bill Gates? Look at all the hard work he has put into reducing the population with vaccines!
2 COMMENTS
2021-03-27 10:39
Make a Comment
Entered by: hskiprob
There is so much false info in this article, I can't believe no one has called them out.
2 COMMENTS
2021-03-27 10:34
Make a Comment
Entered by: hskiprob
There is so much misinformation in this article I can't believe no one has yet called them out. I have been researching articles from around the world since late last year, showing various deaths after taking the various Covid-19 experimental "vaccines". I am now at about 33 article links including one on VERS and you can read them and weep. Vaccine manufacturers have long claimed to stop diseases such as polio, but I think it is one of the great scams in history. More people are now getting polio from the polio vaccine than from nature. I've compiled enough evidence here to prove the Big Pharma Scam and this is not even most of what I have collected. https://rightofchoice.org/2021/01/19/are-vaccines-really-going-to-save-us/
1 COMMENT
2021-03-27 08:18
Make a Comment
Entered by: Redthumb Liberty
All empires/political systems come with an expiration dates. In the final analysis all political systems are an exercise in the art of self-destruction; only two observable characteristics can serve to distinguish between any of them: rate and degree. Which is to ultimately say: the only difference between a good government and a bad (terminal) one is time. “Limited” governments (Republics) just tend to stretch the timeline out a little more than the others. For in the end: Quod corrumpi potest, corrumpetur. Quod corruptum est, peribit. That which can be corrupted, shall be corrupted. That which is corrupted, shall perish. SINE QUA NON Liberty, Truth, Reason
1 COMMENT
2021-03-25 21:50
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
But there is right to carry your private property under the 1st Amendment, as adjudicated as the right to travel. Also, the right to do anything is guaranteed under the 9th Amendment. Running naked down the street is not offensive. It is a right, if one claims it as a right properly.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-25 09:59
Make a Comment
Entered by: trevor
What would it take to have Kamala appear in a blue dress?
1 COMMENT
2021-03-24 11:47
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Why won't this work? First, serve several certified/verified notices over a period of several months to the squater to come to court regarding property rights charges that the owners charge him with. Include everybody who is squatting on the property... not only the main squatter. When they don't show up for court because they will lose their squatter's rights by being gone from the property, get the judge to sign a warrant for their arrest, to compel them to come. Supply the local sheriff with the warrant, so that he has to do his duty, and bring the squatters to court. Meanwhile, have a sympathetic party (agent of the owners) re-squat the property while the squatter is in court. --- Or some form of this.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-23 10:48
Make a Comment
Entered by: Dave Scotese
Thanks for writing this very helpful article. The system makes every effort to remove any appearance in an agent of the state of the capability to become a better person. Those efforts are successful to a great degree, but they don't get the job done completely, which means it is still apparent to those who look that government agents have consciences and will err or simply decline a crucial piece of work which can lead to more moral outcomes. The most effective tool we have against the damaging influence of authority is publishing.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-22 06:13
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Or maybe, Big Tech infiltrators using a little poison.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-22 06:10
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Our focus is wrong. Who would have thought that so many good Christians would focus on help from the medical, and forget about God and His nature? Psalms 103:1-5: "1Praise the Lord, my soul; all my inmost being, praise his holy name. 2Praise the Lord, my soul, and forget not all his benefits— 3who forgives all your sins and heals all your diseases, 4who redeems your life from the pit and crowns you with love and compassion, 5who satisfies your desires with good things so that your youth is renewed like the eagle’s." Fill yourself on God's Word, the Bible, daily.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-22 05:52
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but it seems like the military brass is sliding around the real question. That question is one of protecting the public from insurrection within. The brass seems to be turning it into a question of politics within the military. Why? Has the military been infiltrated by the media and Big Tech? --- If I am a business owner or home owner, politics doesn't have anything to do with rioters harming me and destroying my property. Some people might suggest that politics is the motivation for riots. But such motivation doesn't make destruction of my property a political thing. Rather, it makes the lack of protection by the military to be a willful dereliction of duty by the military. If the military isn't going to do their duty, get rid of them and let the militia take over.
1 COMMENT
2021-03-18 14:37
Make a Comment
Entered by: akseeker
English version at https://www.zdf.de/politik/frontal-21/dokumentation-turbo-tempo-tesla-elon-musk-in-brandenburg-english-100.html
1 COMMENT
2021-03-18 13:11
Make a Comment
Entered by: chris gill
Sorry but I file this under so what....They got away with it and doubtful any one will go to jail, Be personaly heavily fined. or the vote count be redone to show Trump won..... Courts would cower out and use latches or just make the taxpayers pay so they get screwed twice.
News
03-18-2021
1 COMMENT
2021-03-18 11:38
Make a Comment
Entered by: ecs74
I watched this episode of the Highwire (watch all of them). I also came across another article about Geert Vanden Bossche by Rosemary Frei that I think should be read by all to add another perspective to Del's story. https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/the-curious-case-of-geert-vanden-bossche/ Also, on March 16th "The Last American Vagabond" interviewed Rosemary regarding the article she wrote. I suggest folks watch that interview as well. https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/new-covid-vaccines-allowed-without-safety-trials-if-based-on-new-variants-geert-vanden-bossche/
1 COMMENT
2021-03-18 11:21
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
You love your children. And it would be kind of crude to say that they are your property. But essentially, they are your property. You made them. Nobody else did. So, you should own them. Certainly government shouldn't have any authority over your property, except if you sign their ownership over to government. You didn't do that, did you? You might have. The birth certificate is a transfer of property form. If you didn't sign it "non-assumpsit, (your signature)," you transferred your property to government. --- No meeting of the minds, so no contract? If you don't know about it, you can't do anything about it? All government can do is go by what is written - the birth certificate. If you don't like it, rescind your signature off this one, and do a proper one, with non-assumpsit before your signature.
Article
03-17-2021
2 COMMENTS
2021-03-17 13:43
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Oh, by the way. Regarding the comment below. If my accuser, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, doesn't get on the stand and testify, my compensation from him/her for time wasted and for hardship from the arrest is $1 billion in gold. But if he/she simply dismisses the case, $10 billion in gold.
Article
03-17-2021
2 COMMENTS
2021-03-17 13:36
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
The most important point for the defendant, is his right in court to question his accuser, on the stand under oath/affirmation. Who is the accuser on the indictment? Oh yes, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. --- I don't want to question the representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They are not my accusers. At best, they might be some kind of witness. But I want to question my accuser, as allowed by law. I want to let him/her tell me how I have injured him/her, so that I can pay for his/her injuries, so we can be even. We don't even know that there were injuries, because my accuser, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, wasn't even honorable enough to let me know ahead of time that I was hurting him/her. VIVA VOCE, from my accuser, from the stand. Nothing else.