Article Image

IPFS News Link • Government

Tighter Cellphone Laws Might Face Static

• Washington Post
LaHood said he will convene a meeting Sept. 30 to formulate "concrete steps . . . to make drivers think twice about taking their eyes off the road for any reason."

LaHood is counting on frightening numbers -- cellphone use is a factor in an estimated 342,000 auto accident injuries and costs $43 billion each year in property damage, lost wages, medical bills and loss of life -- to help win support.

"The public is sick and tired of people being distracted and causing accidents," he said last week.

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by JustinTyme
Entered on:

Therein lies the problem...  That "evil" little word "but".  Many of the laws/statutes/crap that we have to deal with today are a product of that word.  "But, the Gangbangers might have guns!", "but, the Pedophiles might have children's images on their computers" and the ever pervasive "but, we'll have to let the SERIAL KILLERS out if we don't get more money for the prisons".There are already laws on the books that can be used if someone causes harm to another because of their negligence and they surely carry a much higher penalty than the new one they're going to put in place to collect a "texting tax".  Or, another reason to stop and search.
Just my .02

Comment by David40
Entered on:

I hate laws that infringe on a person's rights, but in this case curbing cell use while driving is a serious safety issue. Every day I encounter close calls and near misses and actual accidents because of people distracted from their driving, most because of cell phones.