He has written the text for aspiring propagandists who would like to learn the art: "For the beginner, [the art of propaganda] can be very difficult to master. Even the experienced propagandist can at times fall into the trap of thinking that creating and disseminating propaganda is a straightforward enterprise – which is a good way to win a permanent all-expenses paid Siberian vacation," he said.

"The following short guidebook will provide the aspiring propagandist, WEF lackey, Communist Apparatchik, Woke Marxist and seasoned government bureaucrat alike with the tools and knowledge necessary to develop their promising talent into full-bloom mastery of the art of propaganda."

As one can imagine, Herzberg's guide is necessarily long.  We are publishing one section at a time so hopeful propagandists don't feel overwhelmed and give up on their dreams of a career in propaganda after the first hurdle.

Section III – Vetting Which Data Are Considered to Be Official Science

Be selective about which data are included in Official Science. Information that has the imprimatur of being Scientific information carries far more weight and credibility with the population, even those who refuse to toe the regime's narrative (no one wants to be seen as being "anti-science" – that's almost as bad as being a racist in modern society).

Table of Contents

III-1. Don't Publish Problematic Studies and if They Get Published, Retract Them

III-2. Cherry-Pick Which Parts of a Dataset Represent "Official Science"

III-3. Delay Reporting Data

About the Author

III-1. Don't Publish Problematic Studies and if They Get Published, Retract Them

The surest way to prevent official Scientific research from taking down a regime narrative is to strip it of its officialness. (Then you hide it away where nobody can access it and claim that since it was retracted that shows it was all along bogus fraudulent junk science pushed by corrupt Anti-Science heretics who want to get rich selling weird vitamin concoctions.)

You must take care however to act promptly, for if you wait too long, copies of unapproved science can circulate in secret amongst non-believers or heretics against the regime and take on nigh-mythical status. And once a study becomes entrenched in people's experience as a "real study," retracting it just makes them think that you're desperate to hide the "truth."