Article Image

News Link • European Union

Will Donald Trump Punish the UK for its Meddling in Two US Presidential Elections?

• Ron Paul Institute - Larry Johnson

Ok. Sorry for the lengthy article, but the substance is important. If the Brits are laboring under the fantasy that they enjoy a special relationship with the United States, it is time for my British cousins to wake up. My thesis is simple: Donald Trump and Kash Patel know that British intelligence officers and assets played a key and enthusiastic role in trying to destroy Donald Trump's campaign for President in 2016 and are likely to hold the UK accountable. In my judgment, Russiagate was a comprehensive, complex intelligence operation that involved the UK, the Australians and the Israelis. Then, four years later, we have Keir Starmer taking a swing at Trump by sending Labour volunteers to the United States in the fall of 2024 to campaign for Kamala Harris. That foreign meddling exceeds anything the Russians are alleged to have done in 2016. If Starmer ever gets an invite to the White House, he better bring a food taster.

In short, I believe that Donald Trump has not forgotten how these foreign intelligence agencies tried to destroy them and does not likely place a high value on seeking further collaboration with them in the future. I am reposting two articles from my archive that addressed the question of how foreign intelligence operative were used to attack Donald Trump and his campaign.

Let me take you back to an article I wrote in May 2019. John Durham and his team failed to address any of the issues and leads I raised:

Do not focus on July 2016 as the so-called start of the counter intelligence investigation of Donald Trump. That is a lie. We know, thanks to the work of Judicial Watch, that the FBI had signed up Christopher Steele as a Confidential Human Source (aka CHS) by February of 2016. It is incumbent on Attorney General Barr to examine the contact reports filed by Steele's FBI handler (those reports are known as FD-1023s). He also, as I have noted in a previous post, needs to look at the FD-1023s for Felix Sater and Henry Greenberg. But these will only tell a small part of the story. There is a massive intelligence side to this story.

The CIA, with the knowledge of the Director of National Intelligence, worked with British counterparts starting in the summer of 2015 to collect intelligence on Republican and at least one Democrat candidate. John Brennan was probably hoping that his proactive steps to help the Hillary Clinton campaign would ensure him taking over as DNI in the new Clinton Administration. Regardless of motives, the CIA enlisted the British intelligence community to start gathering intelligence on most major Republican candidates and on Bernie Sanders. This initial phase of intelligence gathering goes beyond opposition research. The information being gathered identified the key personnel in each campaign and identified the people outside the United States receiving their calls, texts and emails. This information was turned into intelligence reports that then were passed back to the United States intel community as "liaison reporting." This was not put into normal classified channels. This intelligence was put into a SAP, i.e. a Special Access Program.

One person who needs to be called on the carpet and asked some hard questions is current CIA Director Gina Haspel. She was CIA Chief of Station in London at the time and was a regular attendee at the meeting of the Brit's Joint Intelligence Committee aka the JIC. I suppose it is possible she was cut out of the process, but I believe that is unlikely.


thelibertyadvisor.com/declare