Tucker's new documentary blows open the truth about Thomas Matthew Crooks, the would-be assassin who tried to take out President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. For months the FBI claimed Crooks had no online presence… no motive… no history… no trail. But Tucker found what the FBI said didn't exist. And now whistleblowers are speaking out.

So why did it take a journalist — not the FBI — to uncover Crooks' digital footprint?
Why did the Bureau lie about his background?
Why did they cremate his body so quickly?
Why did they only acknowledge anything AFTER Tucker embarrassed them?
And why was Crooks in Washington, DC right before the shooting?