News Link • Economic Theory
Diamonds in the Lab
• https://fee.org, Stefan BartlFrom De Beers's 1940s slogan "A Diamond Is Forever," to "Every Kiss Begins with Kay" and "He Went to Jared," the diamond industry had already done its most important work before anyone chose a ring. It had written the rules of romance: what love looked like, what it cost, and what it said about someone who spent less. Those rules were not ancient traditions. The industry manufactured not diamonds, but desire. Even in popular culture, Rihanna gave us the song "Diamonds." The more interesting economic story, however, is not the diamonds in the sky, but the diamonds in the lab. Desire has not gone anywhere. For the first time, it has a better offer.
Whether in the Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire or the British Imperial State Crown, these jewels did not merely decorate rulers. They performed authority, with every gem communicating prestige. This symbol of power eventually moved from palace to household. Diamonds became not just about monarchy, but also about romance, marriage, and status. This transformation was no accident.
Entering the Kimberley diamond fields in the 1870s, Cecil Rhodes quickly learned that the real power was not merely in finding diamonds, but in controlling their supply. Rhodes established De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited in 1888. By the 1890s, De Beers controlled an estimated 90% of the diamond market, leveraging the Diamond Syndicate in the British Isles to maintain dominance. From mines to merchants, De Beers commanded a monopoly. Yet fearful of competition, Rhodes reportedly warned shareholders that the company's "only risk is the sudden discovery of new mines, which human nature will work recklessly to the detriment of us all." His fear was not that diamonds would become too rare, but that they would become too common.
The diamond market's legacy was built on supply-chain domination, business consolidation, and the careful prevention of abundance.
The combination of enormous value, artificial scarcity, and weak political institutions created lucrative illicit markets. In the post-Cold War era, blood diamonds financed some of Africa's deadliest civil wars. In 2007, Amnesty International reported that "3.7 million people have died in Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Liberia, and Sierra Leone in conflicts fuelled by diamonds." At their peak, these diamonds may have represented as much as 15% of global diamond trade, while some estimates place the true figure closer to 20%.
The international response was the Kimberley Process, launched in 2003 to certify rough diamonds as conflict-free: "By enforcing rigorous certification protocols and compliance assessments, the KP ensures that all participating countries maintain high standards that keep conflict diamonds out of the international market." These formalities failed to reach the reality of the diamond fields.




