Many Americans believe that although the
nation has morphed into a Mussolini-style corporatist state, the rule of
law--laws passed by an elected legislature--keep citizens from
being prosecuted without cause in violation of basic civil
liberties. The following
article will disabuse them of the second notion. We now have rule by
unelected agencies. Question: If we revolt against rule by
unelected agencies, are we breaking the law? Just asking. Just a
hypothetical question.
December 12,
2011
The Wall Street Journal
A Sewage Blunder Earns
Engineer a Criminal Record
By GARY FIELDS And JOHN R.
EMSHWILLER
BOWIE, Md.—Lawrence Lewis was raised in the projects of Washington, D.C.
By the time he was 20, all three of his older brothers had been murdered and
his father was dead of a heart attack.
Seeking an escape, he took night classes while
working as a janitor for the D.C. school system. He rose to become chief
engineer at a military retirement home. He raised his two youngest daughters
alone, determined to show them how to lead a crime-free life.
That
goal was derailed by blocked toilets.
In 2007, Mr. Lewis and his staff diverted a
backed-up sewage system into an outside storm drain—one they long believed was
connected to the city's sewage-treatment system—to prevent flooding in an area
where the sickest residents lived. In fact, the storm drain emptied into a
creek that ultimately reaches the Potomac River.
Eight months later, Mr. Lewis pleaded guilty in
federal court to violating the Clean Water Act. He was given one year's
probation and placed under court-ordered supervision.
"I got a criminal record from my job—when I
thought I was doing the right thing?" says Mr. Lewis, 60 years old.
Mr. Lewis was caught in Washington's four-decade expansion of
federal criminal law. Today, there
are an estimated 4,500 federal crimes on the books, a significant increase from
the three in the Constitution (treason, piracy and counterfeiting). There is an additional, and much larger, number of
regulations written to enforce the laws. One of those regulations ensnared Mr.
Lewis.
Many of these federal infractions are now easier
to prosecute than in the past because of a weakening in a bedrock doctrine of
Anglo-American jurisprudence: the principle of mens rea, or "guilty
mind," which holds that a person shouldn't be convicted if he hasn't shown
an intent to do something wrong. A law without a mens rea requirement tripped
up Mr. Lewis.
Nobody,
including Mr. Lewis, argues that dumping waste into a creek is a good idea.
However, critics of the federal criminal justice system argue the government is
criminalizing mistakes that might more appropriately be handled with civil
fines or injunctions. In Mr. Lewis's case, a Justice Department court filing
acknowledged he didn't realize the waste was going into the creek.
In fact, the
building's manager and Mr. Lewis's then-supervisor, retired Navy Capt. Craig
Sackett, says it was long standard practice at the home—predating Mr. Lewis's
tenure—to divert overflow into nearby storm drains if a backup occurred. This prevented floods within the building itself.
Like Mr. Lewis, Mr. Sackett says he thought the flow was going into the
district's waste-treatment system.
He says he
doesn't know why Mr. Lewis was the one prosecuted. "It was either him or
me," Mr. Sackett says, "and they certainly talked to me."
Mr. Lewis was
one of 788,517 people sentenced for federal crimes between 2000 and 2010. Most
were hit with felonies, such as fraud or drug dealing, which can carry prison
sentences reaching into the decades.
Tens of thousands were found
guilty of misdemeanors, which typically carry jail terms of up to a year. Though less serious than felonies, the possible
impact of a misdemeanor conviction on getting a job or a loan or other aspects
of everyday life "can be quite grave," says Prof. Robert Boruchowitz
of Seattle University law school, who has studied the issue.
"You have a
large community of people who are not considered criminals in the traditional
sense," living with the consequences "for the rest of their
lives," says Lisa Wayne, president of the National Association of Criminal
Defense Lawyers.
Applications for
jobs, loans and occupational licenses—ranging from auctioneers to plumbers—ask
about a person's criminal history. While a conviction is rarely an automatic
disqualification, it can often tip the balance against an applicant, observers
say.
A misdemeanor
conviction can restrict international travel and make joining the military harder.
It "can be disqualifying" for anyone seeking federal employment,
"though the decision is made on a case-by-case basis depending upon a
number of factors," says Angela Bailey of the U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
As a teen, Mr.
Lewis says, he was arrested for assault after getting into a fight, but was
found not guilty. Bad tempers are a family inheritance, he says.
In 1969 his
brother Warren was shot to death. His brother Nathan Jr. was gunned down in
1971. His father, Nathan Sr., had a fatal heart attack when told of his
namesake's death. His third brother, Roy, was stabbed to death weeks later
while in prison on an assault charge.
At first, Mr.
Lewis was fatalistic. "We had the same life. We came out of the same womb.
Why was I different? When was my time coming?" he recalls thinking.
To escape from the world that took
his family, he started work as a janitor for the D.C. Education
Department earning $1.80 an hour. He began taking facilities-management classes
at night and learning about power plants, boiler rooms and maintenance. By the
time he left the Board of Education
in 1993, after 24 years, he had risen to Facility Manager, making nearly
$50,000 a year.
Eventually he moved
on to the Knollwood military retirement center, a sprawling network of living
facilities housing 300 veterans, their spouses and survivors on 16 acres in
northwest Washington.
Sanford Morgan,
Knollwood's engineer before Mr. Lewis, says sewage was a recurring problem.
According to court documents, blockages were usually caused by elderly
residents flushing adult diapers down the toilets. The
backup would clog the pump that normally pushed waste to the appropriate
disposal system.
Melissa Golden for The Wall Street Journal
Sewage went into Rock
Creek, which feeds the Potomac.
"I made
many attempts to correct it," says Mr. Morgan, who has known Mr. Lewis for
more than 20 years and calls him "a straight-up guy."
At 7:30 a.m. on
March 29, 2007, Mr. Lewis and his employees hooked up a hose to deal with the
latest problem. They pumped sewage
into the storm drain until 2:30 p.m., stopping only when authorities began
arriving. A jogger in nearby Rock
Creek Park
had noticed the usually clear creek water was murky. The
Park Police traced the source to Knollwood.
Mr. Sackett was
at Arlington National Cemetery
interring his father-in-law when he got the call. He recalled more emergency
vehicles at Knollwood "than I'd seen in my entire life."
Rock Creek is a
small tributary that flows from Maryland
through Washington, D.C.,
and into the Potomac River. For most of its 12
miles, it isn't possible to put a boat into the water.
For decades,
federal law only covered waters deemed navigable under the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. Over the years, it became waters that could be made navigable. In
1972 the Clean Water Act further broadened the law, as Congress became
concerned about pollution and water quality, spurred by high-profile incidents
such as the Cuyahoga
River catching fire in
1969.
The Environmental Protection
Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which had the job of writing
regulations to enforce the 1972 law, expanded the "waters of the United States"
definition to include tributaries such as Rock Creek. The
argument was that pollution can move downstream to larger bodies of water, says
David M. Uhlmann, director of the Environmental Law and Policy Program at the
University of Michigan Law School.
Spurred by the
2007 raid, Knollwood solved its backup problem by cutting a new manhole and
clearing a buildup of lime, grease and sludge. Mr. Lewis voluntarily attended
EPA classes to learn more about procedures and regulations.
Mr. Lewis
initially wanted to go to trial and fight the charges against him. He says he
had served on many juries over the years and felt his peers would understand
the difference between a criminal act, and a well-intentioned but mistaken act.
"I said, to
hell with pleading guilty, I'm innocent," Mr. Lewis recalls.
But Mr. Lewis's
lawyer, Barry Boss, told him his argument would be tough to make. (Knollwood
paid for Mr. Boss to represent Mr. Lewis.)
In an interview,
Mr. Boss said, "There was no
fight to have. It was a strict liability case," meaning the government
didn't have to prove Mr. Lewis knew he was doing anything wrong. "His good
intentions did not matter." The
lawyer told Mr. Lewis that, to be found guilty, prosecutors needed only to
prove that he was aware that sewage was being pumped into the storm drain that
led to the creek.
In court
documents, the government argued that Mr. Lewis didn't ensure the storm drain
fed into a waste-treatment facility rather than the creek. About 30% of the
city's storm drains flow to a treatment plant, according to the D.C. Water and
Sewer Authority. Plus, the government argued, Mr. Lewis was responsible for
several prior discharges during his time at Knollwood.
Mr. Lewis
decided to plead guilty, fearful he would lose his house if he fought the
charge. He has legal custody of his two youngest children (he has four others).
His mother, Nancy Lewis, 96, also lives with him.
He entered a
guilty plea in December 2007. Prosecutors agreed probation and a $2,500 fine
would be sufficient penalty.
The U.S. Attorney's Office
declined to comment on Mr. Lewis's case or on whether it considered charging
other individuals.
As the family
drove to the courthouse for his sentencing, Mr. Lewis told his daughter
Ijananya, then 16, she might have to drive home if he ended the day in prison.
A few weeks
later, Mr. Boss, Mr. Lewis's attorney, took his client to the probation office
for the first time and recalls him crestfallen. "He was telling me how
he'd spent his adult life trying to show his daughters that not every
African-American man is caught up in the criminal-justice system." Mr.
Lewis says he regularly brings his children to the graveyard where his brothers
are buried, or back to the projects, to show them the consequences of bad
choices.
Bitter over his
conviction, he left Knollwood. He filled out several job applications, all of
which asked if he had ever been arrested or convicted. None of the potential
employers ever called, he says.
Two months into his job search he
filled out an application for a job at Gallaudet
University in Washington. It asked if he had a felony
record or a misdemeanor conviction that required imprisonment—a question that
allowed him to answer "no." He got hired.
He didn't
volunteer any information about his guilty plea to his new employers. But his
probation officers put him in an awkward position, Mr. Lewis says, by making
regular spot checks at the university.
In one instance,
Mr. Lewis's supervisor at Gallaudet noticed the officers and asked Mr. Lewis
what they wanted. "I told him it was somebody I knew who had just stopped
by to check on me," Mr. Lewis says.
The next time the probation
officers came by, "I tried to explain it could create problems for
me," Mr. Lewis says. "They
were nice about it, but they said, 'We have to keep coming.'"
The probation office referred
questions to the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, which wouldn't
comment on Mr. Lewis's case.
Meloyde
Batten-Mickens, executive director of facilities at Gallaudet, says Mr. Lewis
had mentioned he had been in trouble, but didn't provide specifics until more
recently, when he told her the full story. Knowing about his prior conviction
makes no difference, Ms. Batten-Mickens says. "I trust him across the
board."
On probation,
Mr. Lewis had to fill out monthly cash-flow statements showing his salary and
spending to prove he wasn't involved in any unusual activities. He had to hand
over his .357-caliber revolver to a family member for the duration of his
probation.
He also
temporarily lost privacy protections, as he learned when probation officers
made an unannounced 6 a.m. search of his home. They
would tell him only that he'd had an unauthorized contact with police, a
potential probation violation. Mr. Lewis says he assumes the officers were
referring to a traffic stop he had recently been involved in—a stop that didn't
produce a traffic ticket.
After searching
his home for a couple of hours the officers left and never took any further
action. "They went through
everything," Mr. Lewis says. "You'd have thought I had killed
somebody."
Today, Mr. Lewis's life is moving
back to normal. He has a second job at the power plant run by the University of
the District of Columbia,
where he was hired after coming off probation.
For his family,
the episode has left a strong impression. Mr. Lewis's youngest daughter
Shirley, 16, a high-school junior with a 3.8 grade-point average, says her
father's conviction and the circumstances surrounding it have "given me a
firsthand look at what the world is like."
Mr. Lewis says
his lowest point came around the time of his conviction when he went to the
courthouse to be fingerprinted and have his mug shot taken.
"I was
treated like everybody else, like I was a hardened criminal" he says.
"Imagine what I looked like. 'What you in for? Backed up toilets.'"
Copyright 2011 Dow Jones
& Company, Inc. All Ri