as they did with his father, Ron Paul, globalist elitists within the
GOP are pouncing on Kentucky Senator Dr. Rand Paul. Obviously, the
only reason for Republican leaders to be ganging up on Rand like this
is because they are scared silly that he might just win the
Republican nomination for President in 2016. And if there is anything
that frightens the GOP establishment, it is an independent-minded,
non-interventionist, reader of the Constitution--you know, someone
like George Washington or Thomas Jefferson--or Rand Paul.
the past three days alone, Texas Gov. Rick Perry used a Washington
Post op-ed to warn about the dangers of 'isolationism' and
describe Paul as 'curiously blind' to growing threats in Iraq.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) accused the Kentucky senator on CNN of
wanting a 'withdrawal to fortress America.' And former Vice
President Dick Cheney declared at a POLITICO Playbook luncheon on
Monday that 'isolationism is crazy,' while his daughter, Liz
Cheney, said Paul 'leaves something to be desired, in terms of
national security policy.'
preemptive strikes suggest that many in GOP fear Paul is winning the
foreign policy argument with the American people--and that that could
make him a formidable candidate in 2016. After all, second-tier
presidential hopefuls don't usually get shouted down this way.
think the general fear on the part of a lot of leaders in the
Republican Party is that there's an isolationist temptation after
two big wars, an isolationist temptation in the American electorate,'
said Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign
Relations who was a deputy national security adviser in the George W.
Bush administration. 'And I think people are genuinely concerned
about it and desirous of trying to stop it before it spreads
said the GOP establishment is "genuinely concerned" about a Rand
Paul presidency. Baloney! They are pee-in-their-pants,
scared-out-of-their-minds about it. The GOP establishment is far more
concerned over someone like Rand Paul obtaining the White House than
they are a Democrat obtaining the White House. In truth, when it
comes to globalism, there really isn't a dime's worth of
difference between the Democrat and Republican parties in Washington,
D.C. The movers and shakers of both parties are globalist to the
is more than interesting that the Politico report quoted above sought
the opinion of CFR member Elliot Abrams. The Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) is an elitist cabal of globalists that has dominated
the presidential administrations of both Democrats and Republicans
for much of the Twentieth (and now Twenty-First) Century.
this point it is important to remind readers of what Rear Admiral
Chester Ward--himself a CFR member until he realized what it was all
about and withdrew--said about the CFR. Remember, Admiral Ward was
the Judge Advocate General of the Navy from 1956-1960.
Ward said, "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups [such
as the CFR, Trilateral Commission, et al] have one objective in
common--they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and
the national independence of the United States. A second clique of
international members in the CFR . . . comprises the Wall Street
international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the
world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of
also said, "The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is
promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national
independence and submergence into an all-powerful, one world
Ward was exactly right. Even a cursory look at the names of the most
prominent politicians, media personalities, and leaders of the
Federal Reserve shows a preponderance of influence by the CFR. For
example, here is a small listing of some of the most influential
members of the CFR or Trilateral Commission (or sometimes both):
Herbert Walker Bush. Bill Clinton. Sandra Day O'Connor. Dick
Cheney. Les Aspin. Colin Powell. Robert Gates. Brent Scowcroft. Jesse
Jackson, Sr. Mario Cuomo. Dan Rather. Tom Brokaw. David Brinkley.
John Chancellor. Marvin Kalb. Diane Sawyer. Barbara Walters. Cyrus
Vance. Paul Volcker. Henry Kissinger. George Schultz. Alan Greenspan.
Madeleine Albright. Roger Altman. Bruce Babbitt. Howard Baker. Samuel
Berger. Elaine Chao. Dianne Feinstein. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Chuck
Hagel. Gary Hart. John McCain. George Mitchell. Bill Moyers. Jay
Rockefeller. Donna Shalala. Strobe Talbott. Fred Thompson. Robert
Zoellick. Richard Nixon. Hubert H. Humphrey. George McGovern. Gerald
Ford. Jimmy Carter. John Anderson. Walter Mondale. Michael Dukakis.
Al Gore. John Kerry.
readers should immediately notice about this list is the fact that it
is filled with both Democrats and Republicans. Can one imagine the
outrage if the above names were all members of the Christian
Coalition or even the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)? But the
fact that so many of America's leaders from both major parties all
share membership in the CFR seems to go completely unnoticed.
we have in Washington, D.C., is CFR-dominated party D and
CFR-dominated party R. No wonder there hasn't been any significant
change in America's foreign policy since World War II, no matter
which major party controlled the White House and Congress.
globalists within the two major parties will do anything to make sure
that a non-globalist is not elected President of the United States or
given a too-powerful position of congressional leadership. Hence, the
GOP establishment is pouncing on Rand Paul early to try and kill any
momentum he might garner going into the 2016 presidential race.
Virtually everything the global elite plan to do hinge on America
engaging in perpetual war. Perpetual war is the linchpin that holds
the entire globalist agenda intact. Anyone who threatens that
linchpin is declared an enemy by the establishment and is slated for
war allows the internationalists to continue to fund dirty black-ops
drug smuggling, corrupt banking practices, political briberies,
political assassinations, etc. Perpetual war is also the number one
excuse for creating a universal surveillance society within the
United States. Perpetual war justifies spying on the American
citizenry, militarizing local and State police agencies, passing
legislation that allows the federal government to declare any
American citizen an "enemy combatant" or seize and incarcerate
indefinitely any U.S. citizen without warrant or Habeas Corpus, and
send drones into America's heartland.
when it comes to perpetual war and building a Police State at home,
the neocons within the Republican Party are far more dangerous than
Democrats. Far more! With support for abortion-on-demand, homosexual
marriages, the secularization of America's schools and public
institutions, globalists use liberal Democrats to dismantle America's
Christian traditions and value systems. But when it comes to building
both the Warfare State and the Police State, globalists primarily use
"conservative" Republicans. And, of course, when it comes to
obliterating America's traditional culture by swamping the country
with illegal immigrants, both Republicans and Democrats are employed.
That's why you will find as many Republicans (including those at
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce) as Democrats pushing amnesty for
illegals. There is absolutely no doubt that had not Tea-Party
Republicans recently defeated House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (a
major proponent of amnesty) in the Virginia primaries, the GOP-led
House would have joined with Barack Obama and Senate Democrats to
pass amnesty for illegals this summer. That is absolutely undeniable.
We owe Virginia Republicans a huge "Thank You!" (I will write
more about the illegal immigration problem in an upcoming column.)
is no question that right now the battle for the heart and soul (not
to mention the future) of America is the burgeoning police state
complete with its twin-sister perpetual war. And, yes, illegal
immigration is also a major battlefield right now. If the globalist
attempt to turn the United States into a Police State--and again ramp
up more wars of intervention--is not stopped in the next few short
years, it will mean the death of freedom and independence in America
forever. And neocon Republicans are the primary culprits in this
and gentlemen, I don't know how to say it any plainer: if you are
forced to choose between a pro-war, pro-police state, neocon
Republican candidate for federal office and a Democrat, and if you
believe in voting for the "lesser-of-two-evils," the Democrat is
the one for whom you must vote.
that is exactly the choice that the citizens of Montana have this
year in its lone U.S. House race. We have a Democrat, John Lewis,
running against a pro-war, pro-police state, neocon Republican Ryan
Zinke. Without a doubt, the Democrat John Lewis is by far the lesser
evil than Ryan Zinke.
Zinke never met a war he doesn't like. He is already on public
record saying "civilians" should not be allowed to possess .50
caliber rifles. (Of course, now that he is a candidate for Congress,
he has had a sudden election year conversion on the subject.) He has
owning-interest in a drone manufacturing company. He is trying to use
his credentials as a former Navy SEAL to propel him to the U.S.
Congress; but Ryan Zinke is a warmongering, police state facilitator
of the lowest order. Being the U.S. House seat in Montana is
typically a Republican seat, it is very likely that if the Democrat
Lewis wins, he would be a one-termer. A GOP candidate (someone
besides Ryan Zinke, who was the absolute worst of all the candidates
that the GOP had to offer this year) would have a very good chance of
defeating the Democrat Lewis in 2016. On the other hand, if Zinke
wins this November, we are probably going to be stuck with this
neocon indefinitely. This would be a monstrous mistake for Montana
and the U.S. House of Representatives.
a doubt, what the globalist elite at the CFR fear most is a
presidential candidate who refuses to comply with the pro-war,
pro-police state agenda. And while I am still not certain that Rand
Paul has the same courage and convictions of his father, Ron Paul, he
is, without a doubt, the closest ideologically to the Washington and
Jeffersonian vision of non-entanglement in foreign affairs and the
philosophical sacredness of individual liberty that we seem to have
at the national level these days. As such, the GOP establishment is
literally trying to skewer Senator Paul.
GOP establishment is not worried about Texas Governor Rick Perry, New
Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, former Florida Governor
Jeb Bush, or Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan. None of these men would
stand in the way of the globalist agenda. But the GOP establishment
is terrified of Rand Paul--and to a lesser extent Texas Senator Ted
Cruz. But given the way that Republican leaders are pouncing on Mr.
Paul, it is obvious that he is the one they believe poses the
greatest threat to the globalist agenda.
The Liberty Church Project is currently only $15,000 short of its
goal. We are so close! Will you please help me go over the top? If
you believe that we must help free churches from the shackles of the
monstrous 501c3 tax-exempt status, please help me launch the Liberty
Church Project. Our goal is to help establish dozens, scores, and
potentially even hundreds, of liberty-oriented, non-501c3 churches
and resurrect patriot pulpits in America. I am so close! Will you
help me launch the Liberty Church Project?