Part of the way that Government gets around Other Constitutional requirements is to use the one that says that we are free to contract.

Are the State of Arizona and Janice K. Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her Official Capacity, allowed by law or Constitution to freely contract with a Federal District Judge?

The reason that Government doesn't differentiate between us and the individual Social Security entity/trust/agreement/account that has a name just like ours, and has the number that we call our Social Security Number is that they would blow this thing higher than up.

Notice in this article that government talks about "Janice K. Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her Official Capacity." Why, when we are identified by a SSN, don't they talk about us as "John J. Doe, holder of Social Security account numbered xxx-xx-xxxx, in his Official Capacity - or private capacity?

Are they afraid that we might start to find out that most of their excuses for applying all kinds of laws to us, that shouldn't be constitutionally applied to us, are being applied to a Social Security Entity that has a name like ours, because we ignorantly thought the number was our number, and then told them so in court or on other Government paperwork? We are taking the rap that they have handed out to a Social Security account with a name almost like ours.

WE DO NOT HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. THAT NUMBER APPLIES TO A SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT THAT HAS A NAME ALMOST EXACTLY LIKE OURS. THEY IDENTIFIED THE WRONG PERSON/ENTITY WHEN THEY IDENTIFIED A HUMAN BEING AS HAVING A SSN. WHY DO WE KEEP AGREEING WITH THEM?