FREEDOM FORUM: Discussion

Make a Comment

Comments in Response


Comment by McElchap
Entered on:

 AMEN!  I think it would be great if this UBF resolution could be signed by anyone in America as a petition against Obamacare's microchip requirement. I certainly will not take the chip, even if it means I face death. God help us!


Comment by Charles Purdy
Entered on:

There is enough not to like about Obamacare in the plan as it is without adding false requirements to it.   This microchip fantasy has been debunked and deemed a viral myth. Google up the “Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of the 111th Congress, as amended through May 1, 2010 and including Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Health-Related Portions of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010," and  do a search/find for any microchip.  You will find nothing. 

The first version of Obamacare is the House of Representatives’ proposed bill, H.R. 3200, which does have a reference to implanted devices in the the section on “National Medical Device Registry.” But it isn’t what you think it is. Instead, the implants refer to such implanted medical devices as cardiac pacemakers.

We have had four years of  knee-jerk reactions to the swill pumped out of biased media outlets, both broadcast and online, with seemingly no one doing any analytical thinking or independent research.  The election results were the voice of an awakened America crying ENOUGH!  We have grown weary of those trying to justify prophetic rantings from a book of Jewish folklore with current events and using adding false facts to punch up the brew.

 

 

 

 

 





Comment by McElchap
Entered on:

 Hey, Purdy! The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, in Paragraph 1, Section B, specifies "a class II device that is implantable." See page 1002.  On Page 1004 it describes the term "data" gathered by such a device, which may be "...health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the secretary." A class II implantable device, as approved by the FDA, is an "implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information." The government has always pursued total domination by taking incremental steps. Sell the product as convenient and beneficial, and once the unwary public has taken the bait, hooks are set in their jaws. Government loves RFID, it is being used on school kids, nursing home patients, and more. Remember, it can be used for "any other data deemed appropriate by the secretary." Does government ever find ANY of your data inapproriate for government scrutiny? Once a microchip is supposedly implanted for some innocuous health records, what makes you so sure that it might not later be activated to facilitate your financial transactions, as in the "Cashless Society", AKA the "Mark of the Beast"?  Think man! Does government not treat us as mere chattel on a thousand hills, to be branded, tagged, milked, and reduced to leather and roast beef?  I will not take the microchip for ANY purpose!

Make a Comment