Comment by Powell Gammill

Entered on: 7/10/2014 4:31:34 PM

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2014/07/10/there-is-no-need-greater-than-evidence/

Comment by Powell Gammill

Entered on: 7/10/2014 4:46:49 PM

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/virginia-police-commissioned-to-create-child-porn/

Comment by PureTrust

Entered on: 7/11/2014 8:43:35 AM

Will someone please send the boy's guardian to Karl Lentz. Since the police were summoned without a violent act occurring, after the fact, they don't really have anything to do with the situation, directly.

I don't know if Karl will handle it, of course. But if he does, and if the kid and the guardian follow his instructions to a tee, there's a good chance they will be able to sue the police bond or insurance for police stupidity, and everyone else attacking the boy like the police are.

One of Karl's websites: http://www.broadmind.org/.

Some info that is extremely relevant to court cases IF YOU DON'T DO IT KARL'S WAY, and to know even if you DO it Karl's way: http://voidjudgments.com/.

If the boy is guilty, he should pay in some way. But NOT like the articles seem to say that he will be made to pay if they catch him.

Using Karl's method, the police will either back down, or their insurance will make the kid or his guardian rich. Using Karl's method, the boy may wind up in a jury trial... wind up paying a settlement. I wonder what will happen, since the boy is under age, and Karl's method doesn't allow for adult punishment of an under-age person. It's possible that school teachers and the guardian may be made to pay.