Will you gun rights haters stop with the shoot out on the streets BS if we remove gun control already. Chicago has strict gun control & a high murder rate. That shows that gun control doesn't work. We need less of it not more. Why don't you talk about New Hampshire, Stephen? Perhaps because it has little gun control & a murder rate lower than the UK? You're barking up the wrong tree. It's the social dynamics that drive crime that we need to look at not guns.
As with any issue, we have to start with basic principles and moral implications. That means talking about the one moral imperative that guides us in all human relationships, the non-aggression principle [NAP]...It is immoral to initiate the use of force or the threat of force against peaceful people. In other words, a person has to be actually engaging in aggression or credibly threatening to do so before it is morally justifiable to use force in retaliation. What does that have to do with guns? The mere possession of an inanimate object such a gun aggresses against no one. There is no moral justification for taking guns away from people who adhere to the non-aggression principle since this involves initiating the use of force to separate them from their weapons.
It is violation of the NAP that leads to society becoming more unstable and unsafe. The more society is ruled by force the worse the results. As Frederick Bastiat, wrote in his book “The Law” in 1850:
Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself? If such proof is needed, look at the United States. There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person's liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation.
This is the source of the problem, violation of the NAP and the social dynamics that unleashes, not the availability of guns. This is reinforced by modern research such as that of Randolph Roth, a professor at Ohio State University and the author of “American Homicide”. In a presentation at the National Institute for Justice titled “Why Is The United States The Most Homicidal Nation In The Affluent World?”
Comment by Lucky Red
Entered on:
Sure, give 'em guns. And make sure they're free too. Also, don't you dare prosecute them when they start slaughtering goyim and blacks, just like they do with the Palestinians. After all, they're god's self-chosen people and who are we, gentiles, to dare question them supremacy in the world.
Will you gun rights haters stop with the shoot out on the streets BS if we remove gun control already. Chicago has strict gun control & a high murder rate. That shows that gun control doesn't work. We need less of it not more. Why don't you talk about New Hampshire, Stephen? Perhaps because it has little gun control & a murder rate lower than the UK? You're barking up the wrong tree. It's the social dynamics that drive crime that we need to look at not guns. As with any issue, we have to start with basic principles and moral implications. That means talking about the one moral imperative that guides us in all human relationships, the non-aggression principle [NAP]...It is immoral to initiate the use of force or the threat of force against peaceful people. In other words, a person has to be actually engaging in aggression or credibly threatening to do so before it is morally justifiable to use force in retaliation. What does that have to do with guns? The mere possession of an inanimate object such a gun aggresses against no one. There is no moral justification for taking guns away from people who adhere to the non-aggression principle since this involves initiating the use of force to separate them from their weapons. It is violation of the NAP that leads to society becoming more unstable and unsafe. The more society is ruled by force the worse the results. As Frederick Bastiat, wrote in his book “The Law” in 1850: Is there any need to offer proof that this odious perversion of the law is a perpetual source of hatred and discord; that it tends to destroy society itself? If such proof is needed, look at the United States. There is no country in the world where the law is kept more within its proper domain: the protection of every person's liberty and property. As a consequence of this, there appears to be no country in the world where the social order rests on a firmer foundation. This is the source of the problem, violation of the NAP and the social dynamics that unleashes, not the availability of guns. This is reinforced by modern research such as that of Randolph Roth, a professor at Ohio State University and the author of “American Homicide”. In a presentation at the National Institute for Justice titled “Why Is The United States The Most Homicidal Nation In The Affluent World?”
Sure, give 'em guns. And make sure they're free too. Also, don't you dare prosecute them when they start slaughtering goyim and blacks, just like they do with the Palestinians. After all, they're god's self-chosen people and who are we, gentiles, to dare question them supremacy in the world.