The key legal REQUIREMENT is to "SHOW CAUSE". WHY does the state have a compelling interest to pass such a law? The statistics hold up for banning Anal, but NOT 0ral. It turns out that AnalSex is +5000% (Five-THOUSAND) more perilous than 0ral (or just about anything else). Source CDC, WHO: Links at: http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2013/12/05/unprotected_anal_sex_monogamy_doesn_t_make_it_safe.html http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2005/09/ass_backwards.html
The key legal REQUIREMENT is to "SHOW CAUSE". WHY does the state have a compelling interest to pass such a law? The statistics hold up for banning Anal, but NOT 0ral. It turns out that AnalSex is +5000% (Five-THOUSAND) more perilous than 0ral (or just about anything else). Source CDC, WHO: Links at: http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2013/12/05/unprotected_anal_sex_monogamy_doesn_t_make_it_safe.html http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2005/09/ass_backwards.html