Here is the article in question
. I am more than happy to bring it back to everyone's attention. Of course the article is one sided. It reports both the basis of a publicly filed lawsuit and a report of the lawsuit's service on the primary defendant.
Officer Gilbert is always more than welcome to post an unedited response on FP to tell his side of the story at any time he wishes. Or the Dept. can shell out some more taxpayer money to cover up some more of Officer Gilbert's alleged misdeeds as is standard Dept. practice for all of its fine officers. I believe the address on where they can send the check is noted in the lawsuit.
Obedience is not a duty of a free people.