Article Image

IPFS News Link • Media: Internet

Neo-Marxist Behind the Obama/FTC Attacks on Bloggers and Aggregators

“Only government can implement policies and subsidies to provide an institutional framework for quality journalism,” and "In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick-by-brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.”

4 Comments in Response to

Comment by Olde Reb
Entered on:

Damn, I love these comments. We have come a long way from NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY and NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON. The people are recognizing that an actual problem exists.

But where is the action to be ?? Are the TEA PARTIES being rolled into the Republican party and the same lies and renunciations of campaign promises that has been the practice for the past 110 years to continue ?? (Okay, I will investigate becoming involved.)

Is there any possibility of promoting state legislative bodies to present a unified renunciation of numerous federal actions ??


Comment by Ross Wolf
Entered on:

Who Would You Trust More To Run U.S. Government Obama/Or The U.S. Military the Next 2-years?

The Neomarxist behind the Obama/FTC intend to use Taxpayers dollars to inhibit and shutdown alternative media including bloggers that are key to grass-roots communications and political movements. When you consider the DISCLOSE Act there is a definite pattern emerging here by Obama Democrats to stop Americans from communicating and getting real information. If Obama’s Marxist associates get their way Americans will be inundated with Obama propaganda. Children unaware of Obama’s one-sided Marxist propaganda will increasingly be brainwashed at school, Radio and TV by Obama media and media policies that restrict free flow of information. Historically when communists take over a nation they take control of the media and all forms communications to control information. If Obamaists get this power to control and sensor information in newspapers, broadcasting systems and restrict Internet grass-roots Bloggers, Americans will not have sufficient information to make informed decisions. What Obama has proposed threatens our National Security. Member of political parties in other countries that have attempted or succeed in this forced censorship have been arrested for treason, e.g. trying to takeover or overthrow a nation. While Americans consider Obama’s plan to extinguish Americans’ right to know, restrict American’s right to communicate information via the Internet and Obama’s attempt to propagandize the news, paying writers to write what Obamaist tell them, perhaps consideration should be given to having these people in government lawfully charged with crimes, e.g. treason. For example are there persons in the Obama government pushing these plans and polices that support a cause that promulgates overthrow of the United States. While some in U.S. Government might describe what they propose as a brick at a time thing to dismantle capitalism, does their endgame constitute planned destruction of the United States?  If it does, what should Americans do to stop it? Citizens in other countries to prevent communists taking over their country have arrested communists in large numbers. If vast censorship is the Obama government’s first step to silence Americans, to stop our flow of information, what is Obama’s second step? Interestingly most Americans have always opposed a military government. But since Obama got into office, more Americans are quietly stating they would trust the U.S. Military running U.S. Government temporarily over the Marists in Obama’s government; Americans are stating that they would support a quasi-military form of government if civil rights were for the most part protected provided the Marxists in U.S. Government were deposed.  Millions of Americans can relate to their U.S. Military but find nothing in common with Obama and his supporters. Many Americans appear to fear more the Obama government that the idea of U.S. Military temporally running U.S. Government.  In comparison the number of Marxists in the U.S. are small, but having them manage any part of our government is not in the best interest of our economy, national defense and National Security.

Comment by Ross Wolf
Entered on:

Could Obama Be America’s First Defacto President?

Innocent Americans increasingly are sent to prison based on false evidence manufactured by police forensic crime labs. Now President Obama wants the power to incarcerate U.S. Citizens not on evidence, but for what they might do.

Compare: Two days after the 1933 burning of Germany’s Parliament Building, blamed on communists, Hitler responded with a powerful speech before Parliament. Hitler asked Parliament to suspend sections of the Reich Constitution that protected Citizens’ Rights and Civil Liberties. Hitler said the suspension was necessary so government could protect the homeland from being destroyed by communists. Hitler promised Parliament the Constitution would later be restored. After Parliament passed Hitler’s Discriminatory Decrees and Hitler signed it February 28, 1933, Hitler immediately used the news laws to abolished Parliament. See Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Laws below:

Obama gave a speech in May 2010, that proposed incarcerating in indefinite prolonged detention without evidence, any person government deemed a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future; that would include U.S. Citizens “without evidence of wrongdoing.” With that amount power Obama like Hitler could arrest members of Congress, drag U.S. Citizens off the street and from their homes to be imprisoned indefinitely based only on Government’s claim they are a “combatant” or likely to engage in a violent act in the future.

If Congress approves Obama’s categories of people likely to engage in violent acts, overnight millions of lawful U.S. activists could be subject to arrest, Indefinite Prolonged Detention. When you examine Obama’s speech, it appears Obama wants retroactive power to incarcerate anyone government claims (prior) supported violent acts on the premise that person is likely to support violent acts in the future: U.S. activists would be extremely vulnerable because no activist can control what another activist or group might do illegally they network with domestically or overseas. Government would only have to allege a person; group or organization might commit a violent act in the future to order Preventative Detention of lawful participants with no evidence whatsoever. Americans would be afraid to speak out.  See: Obama Sound-Video

It is foreseeable any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners could be deemed by authorities a “Combatant” or likely to engage in or cause violent acts: government too easily could claim an author’s writings inspired people in the past and will in the future to commit or support violent acts. It is problematic that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel; interrogated, will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while held in indefinite Prolonged Detention. Obama wants the power to override the U.S. Constitution. Obama wants the power to detain indefinitely any American without probable cause or evidence, based on conjecture someone might do something violent in the future.

Obama similar to Hitler is centralizing power in the federal Government by getting passed legislation the U.S. government could potentially use to intimidate and threaten corporations among others. Hitler got passed similar laws shortly before the burning of the German Parliament building blamed on the communists. Immediately after the fire, Hitler used his new laws to coerce corporations and influential Citizens to support passage of fascist legislation that suspended provisions of the German Constitution that protected Citizens’ freedoms and civil liberties. Obama is now approaching a position where he can use similar new laws, including the Patriot Act and 200 asset forfeiture laws to seize any corporation or individual’s assets; and force U.S. corporations and other institutions like Hitler did to support legislation that threatens or curtails rights of Americans.

More recently Obama has moved forward to crush Free Speech, silence his critics by pushing passage of HR 5175: this abomination will choke the 1st Amendment, denying the right of free speech to ordinary Americans. Under Title II: groups like Gun Owners of America and other groups including bloggers that only mention “public officials” within 60 days of an election, could be required to file onerous disclosures–and potentially have to disclose their membership lists—despite the Supreme Court ruling in NAACP v. Alabama that held membership lists like those of GOA's) are off limits to government control. Is Obama’s support of HR 5175 similar to what Hitler did to shut up his critics? In the run up to Parliament passing his police state laws including the 1933 Discriminatory Decrees that abolished Citizen’s Free Speech, Hitler employed thugs to beat up reporters, arrest anyone who had courage to criticize the Fuhrer or his Nazi government or expose introduced legislation. Is Obama by supporting HR 5175 to shut up his critics, trying to take American to the same place?

Alarmingly the Obama Government recently employed a vendor to search Internet social networking sites to collect information about Americans that could potentially be used by this government to injure Americans, for example, if you apply for a federal job, your name might be crossed referenced by the Obama Government with comments you made at Websites against Obama; or if you make application at a bank for a loan the Government has control since the financial crisis, could your Internet comment(s) prevent you getting that loan? Obama’s monitoring of the Internet sites can too easily be used by Government to intimidate Citizens from speaking out. Obama Top CZAR Cass Sunstein prepared a 2008 paper that proposed spying on Americans, infiltrating groups and organizations to obstruct Free Speech, disrupt the exchange of ideas and disseminate false information to neutralize Americans that might question government. See:

To hear Obama proposing Indefinite Detention without evidence, access sound video at following web address:

See Hitler’s 1933 Nazi Laws below:


Note: Based on translations by State Department, National Socialism, 1942 PP. 215-17, and Pollak, J.K., and Heneman, H.J., The Hitler Decrees, (1934), pp. 10-11.7

In virtue of Section 48 (2) of the German Constitution, the following is decreed as a defensive measure against Communist acts of Violence, endangering the state:

Section 1
Sections 114, 115, 117, 118, 123, 124, and 153 of the Constitution of the German Reich are suspended until further notice. Thus, restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press, on the right of assembly and the right of association, and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications, and warrants for house-searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.

Section 2
If in a state the measures necessary for the restoration of public security and order are not taken, the Reich Government may temporarily take over the powers of the highest state authority.

Section 4
Whoever provokes, or appeals for or incites to the disobedience of the orders given out by the supreme state authorities or the authorities subject to then for the execution of this decree, or the orders given by the Reich Government according to Section 2, is punishable—insofar as the deed, is not covered by the decree with more severe punishment and with imprisonment of not less that one month, or with a fine from 150 up to 15,000 Reichsmarks.

Whoever endangers human life by violating Section 1, is to be punished by sentence to a penitentiary, under mitigating circumstances with imprisonment of not less than six months and, when violation causes the death of a person, with death, under mitigating circumstances with a penitentiary sentence of not less that two years. In addition the sentence my include confiscation of property.

Whoever provokes an inciter to or act contrary to public welfare is to be punished with a penitentiary sentence, under mitigating circumstances, with imprisonment of not less than three months.

Section 5
The crimes which under the Criminal Code are punishable with penitentiary for life are to be punished with death: i.e., in Sections 81 (high treason), 229 (poisoning), 306 (arson), 311 (explosion), 312 (floods), 315, paragraph 2 (damage to railroad properties, 324 (general poisoning).

Insofar as a more severe punishment has not been previously provided for, the following are punishable with death or with life imprisonment or with imprisonment not to exceed 15 years:

1. Anyone who undertakes to kill the Reich President or a member or a commissioner of the Reich Government or of a state government, or provokes to such a killing, or agrees to commit it, or accepts such an offer, or conspires with another for such a murder;

2. Anyone who under Section 115 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious rioting) or of Section 125 (2) of the Criminal Code (serious disturbance of the peace) commits the act with arms or cooperates consciously and intentionally with an armed person;

3. Anyone who commits a kidnapping under Section 239 of the Criminal with the intention of making use of the kidnapped person as a hostage in the political struggle.

Section 6
This decree enters in force on the day of its promulgation.

Reich President
Reich Chancellor
Reich Minister of the Interior
Reich Minister of Justice 

Comment by Die Daily
Entered on:

Communist by day. Fascist by night. Obama's got it all going.