Article Image

IPFS News Link • Economy - Economics USA

Me, My Money, and My Devices

• Ignacio Mas via

Money is a common language we all agree to use to convey the of value of things. Since the Chinese starting using cowrie shells as an early form of currency more than 3,000 years ago, societies everywhere have been looking for forms of money that are portable, divisible, durable, and reasonably stable in supply. Over time, money has become less physical and more symbolic: tangible commodities such as gold have given way to tokenized paper and now to ephemeral digits in a computer.

The proliferation of digital communication technologies means we can now marshal our money with remarkable speed and ease—checking balances from a mobile phone, making a payment pretty much anywhere merely by showing a thin slab of plastic, buying and selling stock over the Internet. Yet beyond the transactional speed and convenience, our concept of money and the ways we handle it have not been radically transformed.

Personal Internet banking is convenient, for example, but the services you find online are the same ones that were available when you used to walk over to the branch. You still have to choose among prepackaged accounts. If you move money from your checking to your savings account, the bank remains oblivious to whether you are doing so to put aside money for your kids' schooling or for the family holiday. You can buy a certificate of deposit, but you can't choose the maturity date: why can't you set it to come due the same day you plan to leave on an expensive trip? The banks' failure of imagination is exposing them to disruptive entry by players specializing in customer management and user interface design. Examples include, which consolidates all of a user's financial accounts and information in one place, and Simple, an alternative banking service that promises fewer fees and better customer service.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by BrutusEctos
Entered on:

You must know what money is. Don’t try to be smart when actually you are ignorant about money. Like Congressman Ron Paul when he dangled a "silver circle" on the face of the Chairman of the Federal Reserves and because it is silver, he taunted Chairman Bernanke that it is money which he accused the Chairman of "destroying".

Obviously, the Congressman did not know what he was talking about. The "silver circle" has "value" because of its silver content. It is a "token" coin, but it is not money.

To a politician whose knowledge of monetary economics is only hearsay, that is an abomination. You cannot trust ignorant politicians in Congress when they start talking about the economy, and the least of it is money when they don’t even know what it is.