IPFS News Link • Conspiracies
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Conspiracies
On the 49th
anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, among
the glaring issues that cry out for explanation is the multiple
delivery of Kennedy’s body to the Bethesda morgue on the evening
of the assassination. After almost half-a-century, the government
agencies and government officials who were involved still refuse
to provide an explanation into that highly unusual and very mysterious
episode. In fact, they still won’t even acknowledge that it happened
despite the overwhelming amount of evidence that it did happen.
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Conspiracies
Bill Gates Complains 'Conspiracy Theorists' Make His 'Super Important Work' Much Har
News Link •
Conspiracies
The WEF Davos 2024 Circus: Their One Objective Is "Massively To Reduce World Population"
News Link •
Arizona's Top News
AZGOP's new chair - $15k/mo from AZ taxpayers to 'consult' the state senate.. (Updates 2
News Link •
Conspiracies
Twitter BLOCKS Searches For Taylor Swift Over AI Photos, PsyOp Conspiracy GOES WILD
News Link •
American History
Robert F Kennedy Jr Names 2nd Shooter Who Killed His Father with Sirhan Sirhan (Part 7)
News Link •
Entertainment: Sports
Canadian TV station appears to stir up NFL script conspiracies with 49ers-Ravens Super Bowl graphic
News Link •
Scams
Aaron Rodgers Weighs In On The "Super Bowl Logo Color Conspiracy" | Pat McAfee Reacts
News Link •
Investigations
Russia FSB Guy Told Me Today, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was KILLED in Kiev
News Link •
Conspiracies
3 Extremely Alarming Developments Which Could Have Enormous Global Implications
News Link •
Conspiracies
3 Comments in Response to The Ongoing Kennedy Casket Mystery - by Jacob G. Hornberger
Oh, by the way, one little additional piece of info regarding holding your body in trust, if you do, you may possibly be NOT liable for any of the laws of the United States, legally, no matter what the laws may be. They might be laws regarding damages to property, or bodily harm to someone, including death. How can this be?
A trust is a contract. Article I, section 10, clause 1 states in part: "No State shall ... pass any ... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, ... ." If your team of lawyers can figure out the proper legal language for a trust that can take you entirely out of the jurisdiction of any Governmental body, you just might be free to do anything without Governmental repercussions whatsoever.
Remember the "Ted" Kennedy Chappaquiddick Island incident? Remember how he got out of losing all of his property to the family of Mary Jo Kopechne? He did it by not owning any property - except, perhaps, the shirt on his back. The rest of "his" property was in trust. He didn't own it. He simply manipulated the trust. They couldn't take what he didn't own - what the trust owned.
I strongly suspect that many of the Kennedys held (hold?) their bodies in trust right along with everything else that they "don't own." This means that their bodies don't belong to them, but to a trust of some form.
Since a person vacates his body when he dies, if the body is in trust, the trust kicks in to take care of the body that is left. I strongly suspect that part of the JFK cover-up was not a cover-up at all. Rather, it was the trust guidelines being followed.
Many trusts are written with privacy rules. This means that the details of the trust can only be shown to certain people, at appropriate times, under penalty of perjury or other penalty. Probably, it was all according to trust that people were sworn to secrecy with regard to events around the death of JFK. Breaking silence at a later date placed them in a position of being sued or worse. Suit didn't follow when they broke their silence, because it wasn't worth it to the trustees of the JFK body trust to prosecute.
Even Jackie may have been part of the trust. At least she knew much about its existence. The fact that she wasn't aware of how the trust operation was being carried out, doesn't mean she was ignorant of the trust. The fact that she teamed up with Onassis shows that she may have feared strong repercussions from the trustees.
Ask many highschool kids if the truth about Kennedy's assination is important to them, they'll say 'no' - - that is if they don't ask who Kennedy was.