News Link • Propaganda
Thacker Dismantles WSJ Propaganda Over Gain-Of-Function Research
• Zero HedgeFor starters, they frame opposition to GoF as partisan, and suggest that concerns over it are recent. Journalist Paul Thacker of The Disinformation Chronicle breaks it down.
For example, the WSJ writes "The gain-of-function studies had been a staple of research into viruses, but became an object of controversy and criticism during the pandemic crisis. Republicans in Congress criticized the studies."
Wrong: GoF has been under scrutiny for more than a decade. In fact, the Obama Administration banned it in 2014, which is why Dr. Anthony Fauci offshored it to Wuhan, China via EcoHealth Alliance.
1) This @WSJ article by @NidhiSubs & @l_e_whyte is a bit of a mess. Here's why
— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) January 23, 2025
A. Frames concern of dangerous research as partisan
B. Falsely states "Republicans" think pandemic started in a lab.
C. Quotes researcher w/ COI
D. Misleading reporting on COVID origins pic.twitter.com/5bF5VhJ82C




