News Link • DOJ-Department of justice
Bondi's DOJ Defends 1934 Gun Law, Clashing With Trump's Pro-2A Agenda In Suppressor Case
• Zero HedgeBy Aidan Johnston, Director of Federal Affairs for Gun Owners of America,
The Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi is defending one of the most outdated and constitutionally suspect gun control measures still on the books: the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) and its restrictions on suppressors. In the Peterson case, now before the Fifth Circuit, DOJ has argued that NFA gun registration and other restrictions are valid despite acknowledging that suppressors fall within the Second Amendment's protections
????BREAKING??????The Trump Administration just said that suppressors are protected by the 2nd Amendment BUT…
— Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) May 23, 2025
…the tax & registration under the archaic National Firearms Act is "constitutional because [suppressors are] readily adaptable to criminal misuse." pic.twitter.com/dS8uN6O3vR




